Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] Call for action for Roassal

2016-03-07 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Thanks! Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On Mar 7, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Johan Fabry wrote: > > > Better late than never :-) (working on the holidays backlog) > > I only ha

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] Call for action for Roassal

2016-03-07 Thread Johan Fabry
Better late than never :-) (working on the holidays backlog) I only have one request: better positioning on labels of nodes and edges. For example see the image: three of the four labels are badly positioned because the bounding box of their text is intersected by one or more edges. I know th

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] Call for action for Roassal

2016-02-25 Thread Tudor Girba
This is very cool. We will all benefit from this documentation. One thing that I would still like to see fixed before the release is the edge building (this problem of not being able to properly specify random objects to be taken into account when building edges). Could we work on that? Cheers,

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] Call for action for Roassal

2016-02-24 Thread Alexandre Bergel
>> Dear community, >> What are the 3 aspects you would like to see improved in Roassal? > > My favorite improvement would not really be a Roassal feature > but would save me a lot of time: > I would like the configuration versions to stop depending on numbered > versions of outside dependenc