Necessary?
I can't see that. It seems patently wrong once you consider the cases that
cannot be supported.
On Dec 2, 2017 12:02, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" wrote:
>
>
> > On 2 Dec 2017, at 17:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
> >
> > After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
>
> On 2 Dec 2017, at 17:21, Peter Uhnák wrote:
>
> After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
> directly was always fine... I found out that TestRunner's coverageRun is
> using #valueUnpreemptively to run all tests.
>
> The problem is that one of the tests is ret
After much digging as to why my tests are timing out even though running
directly was always fine... I found out that TestRunner's coverageRun is
using #valueUnpreemptively to run all tests.
The problem is that one of the tests is retrieving something over network,
and that apparently doesn't go w
