Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-03 Thread Hilaire
Thanks for the update. I will see, I don't use GIT and will not as drgeo code is on Launchpad and the CVS is Bazaar. Launchpad comes with handing tooling to ease the work of translators. Hilaire Le 03/04/2018 à 00:01, Thierry Goubier a écrit : Hi Hilaire, a BaselineOf is the same as a bas

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-02 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Hilaire, a BaselineOf is the same as a baseline method in a ConfigurationOf: a list of packages with their prerequisites and groups. What the BaselineOf does not contain are methods describing versions with package versions and author names; instead, what a BaselineOf says is: fetch the l

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-02 Thread Hilaire
Reading the BaselineOf class comment, will start with that.. Le 02/04/2018 à 21:13, Hilaire a écrit : My needs are simple, but still I don't understand what I should do from my ConfigurationOfDrGeo -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-02 Thread Hilaire
My needs are simple, but still I don't understand what I should do from my ConfigurationOfDrGeo Le 02/04/2018 à 19:53, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : Hilaire A BaselineOf is the equivalent in better to a ConifgurationOf The key benefit is that you just specify a kind of ConfigurationOf baseline

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-02 Thread Stephane Ducasse
ressources (icons, text...) and this is cool Stef -- Forwarded message -- From: Hilaire Date: Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Hi Dale, Sorry to reply very lately to your help email, I am getting

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-04-02 Thread Hilaire
Hi Dale, Sorry to reply very lately to your help email, I am getting slow on Pharo those those days. I am afraid to be a bit out of sync: what is a BaselineOf? I only have a ConfigurationOfDrGeo and baseline methods into. Hilaire Le 18/01/2018 à 16:10, Dale Henrichs a écrit : Hilaire,

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Ben Coman
On 18 January 2018 at 22:06, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Peter Kenny wrote >> Are you sure it's a bot? Google the name - there is a real person living >> near Seattle, with an interest in Smalltalk. > > I browsed some other posts from this account to the lists on Nabble. They > were more obviously o

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Dale Henrichs
Hilaire, Have you included a method in your BaselineOf that looks like this: projectClass     ^ MetacelloCypressBaselineProject if not, then what looks like a package-cache problem could be that you haven't told Metacello that you are using a metadataless filetree/tonel repository.

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Hilaire
It was a month ago; I don't remember the details but from what I can recover from my memory the scenario was: - From my dev. environment I saved code through Tonel, in the DrGeo used CVS. - When building, I specifically ask the code saved thought Tonel to be installed but the package-cache c

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Hilaire
Ok, the scary part get out then. According to what I understood, here three things for Kjell regarding his interest on DrGeo: 1) Get my latest DrGeo build[1]. The shipped VM within the application is out of sync, therefore a recent 32Bits VM should be used against the image located in DrGeo.

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Dale Henrichs
Hilaire, Metacello just uses Monticello for loading and it is Monticello that is using the package-cache ... if there were a way to turn of the package-cache for Monticello I don't think that Metacello would know the difference. But, I am curious why you care whether or not package is used?

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Peter Kenny wrote > Are you sure it's a bot? Google the name - there is a real person living > near Seattle, with an interest in Smalltalk. I browsed some other posts from this account to the lists on Nabble. They were more obviously on topic. Also, I met Kjell at a Smalltalk conference or two. My

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Marcus Denker
Original Message- > From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of > Marcus Denker > Sent: 18 January 2018 12:47 > To: Any question about pharo is welcome > Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use > > yes, I will do that.

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread PBKResearch
n. Peter Kenny -Original Message- From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker Sent: 18 January 2018 12:47 To: Any question about pharo is welcome Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use yes, I will do that. I definitely is a

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Marcus Denker
yes, I will do that. I definitely is a bot I think the same that posted nonsense to Discord and years ago already to this list. Marcus > On 18 Jan 2018, at 12:08, Tudor Girba wrote: > > Should we not block this account? It looks generated … although it is quite > scary how not easy it

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Hilaire
Indeed it is scary... but it's still non sense. Le 18/01/2018 à 12:08, Tudor Girba a écrit : Should we not block this account? It looks generated … although it is quite scary how not easy it is to not figure this out. -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Tudor Girba
Should we not block this account? It looks generated … although it is quite scary how not easy it is to not figure this out. Cheers, Doru > On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Kjell Godo wrote: > > it’s those weight limits on the luggage they spook you > they spooked me they spooked us >

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Kjell Godo
it’s those weight limits on the luggage they spook you they spooked me they spooked us but they are not really limits you just have to pay more but you don’t actually find that out until you get there or if you want to spend an hour on the phone asking about it well pr

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Kjell Godo
i want it I’m going to get it if i can click download on it i don’t care about 43MB is there an image stripper? ( Dolphin has an image stripper you can modify. after stripping the .exe file was about 6MB ) if this is 43MB of just DrGeo then i think it’s fine i don’t know what anybo

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-18 Thread Hilaire
Le 18/01/2018 à 05:30, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit : Which Pharo version? P7 Have you found any solution to this? I find a workaround.  My bash script to build DrGeo image just remove the content of the package-cache directory. In Gofer there was #disablePackageCache, in Metacello I don't

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2018-01-17 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Hi Hilaire, Which Pharo version? Have you found any solution to this? In Gofer there was #disablePackageCache, in Metacello I don't know, maybe experimenting with MetacelloLoaderPolicy but there are no class comments. Cheers, Hernán 2017-12-18 17:24 GMT-03:00 Hilaire : > If understood correctly

Re: [Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2017-12-18 Thread Hilaire
If understood correctly, when using a tonel file repository to build up an image, Pharo seems instead to take the sources from some package-cache, which is out of sync, because the tonel file repo was updated from another image, with a different cache. I guess I can trick the file system but it

[Pharo-users] unsolicited package-cache use

2017-12-10 Thread Hilaire
I am using tonel format to install from and save to a local repository. How to prevent Monticello/Configuration/Metacello to save packages to the image package-cache dir? Even when installing from a configuration with repo on tonel file format, packages get created in the image package-cache