Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-17 Thread Alistair Grant
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 09:53:55PM +0200, stepharo wrote: > > > Le 17/4/16 10:01, Alistair Grant a écrit : > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 01:43:29PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > > > A new version of PBE is almost ready. You can find it at > > > https://ci.inria.fr/ > > > pharo-contribution/view/B

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-17 Thread stepharo
Le 17/4/16 10:01, Alistair Grant a écrit : On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 01:43:29PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: A new version of PBE is almost ready. You can find it at https://ci.inria.fr/ pharo-contribution/view/Books/job/UpdatedPharoByExample/lastSuccessfulBuild/ artifact/book-result/UpdatedPhar

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-17 Thread Alistair Grant
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 01:43:29PM +0200, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > A new version of PBE is almost ready. You can find it at https://ci.inria.fr/ > pharo-contribution/view/Books/job/UpdatedPharoByExample/lastSuccessfulBuild/ > artifact/book-result/UpdatedPharoByExample.pdf . > Other formats https://c

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-16 Thread Cyril Ferlicot
On Saturday, 16 April 2016, Alistair Grant wrote: > > > Thanks. I had started reading Pharo by Example, but it looks like Deep > into Pharo is more up to date. > > A new version of PBE is almost ready. You can find it at https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Books/job/UpdatedPharoByExample/

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-16 Thread Alistair Grant
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:37:39AM +0200, stepharo wrote: > Have a look at the chapter about command handler in Deep into Pharo > because you have all you need > > You can script the loading and execution of expressions easily. > > People like julien, damien at Pharodays started to resume a bette

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread stepharo
Le 14/4/16 01:52, Damien Pollet a écrit : Heh. The last days I've had a look at Coral… my current goal is to remove the dependency to PetitParser from the argument parser, and to re-integrate that with the commandline handler system of the image. But that's only one part… Yes it would be re

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread stepharo
Have a look at the chapter about command handler in Deep into Pharo because you have all you need You can script the loading and execution of expressions easily. People like julien, damien at Pharodays started to resume a better DSL for command descriptions. Le 13/4/16 19:48, Alistair Grant

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread Damien Pollet
Heh. The last days I've had a look at Coral… my current goal is to remove the dependency to PetitParser from the argument parser, and to re-integrate that with the commandline handler system of the image. But that's only one part… On 14 April 2016 at 01:43, Ben Coman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 201

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread Ben Coman
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Alistair Grant wrote: > * I'm glad that being able to run headless mode is easy, as I'd like to > use Pharo for scripting. I'm not sure of its status, but Coral was some experiments along this line... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLb_rMcNN6k > * I'm still g

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread Alistair Grant
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:55:22PM +0200, stepharo wrote: > > > > I'd be happy to, thanks. Please let me know what I need to do to get > > involved (and remember that this is my hobby and I don't get as much > > time as I'd like, so my responses won't always be as fast as we'd like). > > - start

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread Alistair Grant
Combining several replies in to one... On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:37:30PM +0200, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > On 12-04-16 19:51, Alistair Grant wrote: > > I only have one suggested improvement so far (assuming it doesn't > > already exist and I just haven't found it yet)... When searching for > > pa

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread stepharo
I'd be happy to, thanks. Please let me know what I need to do to get involved (and remember that this is my hobby and I don't get as much time as I'd like, so my responses won't always be as fast as we'd like). - start to see if you can write the scripts you want. - identify missing function

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-13 Thread Alistair Grant
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:28:07PM +0200, stepharo wrote: > Le 12/4/16 19:51, Alistair Grant a écrit : > > * I'm glad that being able to run headless mode is easy, as I'd like to > >use Pharo for scripting. > Me too. We are starting a new iteration on this. We got a student whose job > is to co

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-12 Thread stepharo
Le 13/4/16 06:48, John Pfersich a écrit : On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:51, Alistair Grant wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-) But your description is nice also. Ahh, right, sorry about that. Phar

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-12 Thread John Pfersich
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:51, Alistair Grant wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: >> Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-) >> But your description is nice also. > > Ahh, right, sorry about that. > > Pharo 5.0 first impressions fr

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-12 Thread stepharo
Le 12/4/16 19:51, Alistair Grant a écrit : On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-) But your description is nice also. Ahh, right, sorry about that. Pharo 5.0 first impressions from someone coming from VW2

Re: [Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-12 Thread Stephan Eggermont
On 12-04-16 19:51, Alistair Grant wrote: I only have one suggested improvement so far (assuming it doesn't already exist and I just haven't found it yet)... When searching for packages on SqueakSource / SmalltalkHub etc. it isn't clear to me how much confidence I can have in any given package,

[Pharo-users] First impressions, was About Box

2016-04-12 Thread Alistair Grant
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:02:52PM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-) > But your description is nice also. Ahh, right, sorry about that. Pharo 5.0 first impressions from someone coming from VW2.5... I'm already a fan of Smalltalk and it

Re: [Pharo-users] first impressions

2015-03-27 Thread Camille
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:48, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > >> Am 27.03.2015 um 05:50 schrieb Martin Bähr >> > >: >> >> from what I've experienced so far, Smalltalk is all it's cracked up to be! > > What does it mean? That it’s living up to its reputation.

Re: [Pharo-users] first impressions

2015-03-27 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 27.03.2015 um 05:50 schrieb Martin Bähr > : > > from what I've experienced so far, Smalltalk is all it's cracked up to be! What does it mean? Norbert

[Pharo-users] first impressions

2015-03-26 Thread Martin Bähr
from a GSoC proposal: "from what I've experienced so far, Smalltalk is all it's cracked up to be!" greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programme