Hi Doru,
I have seen your answer on the thread. I hope to make some test tonight
and keep you posted.
Thanks,
Offray
On 08/05/2014 12:13 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I could not reply earlier. I will search the other mails where you ask the
question and address it.
Cheers,
Doru
On
Hi,
Sorry I could not reply earlier. I will search the other mails where you
ask the question and address it.
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <
off...@riseup.net> wrote:
> I would like to help with the playground too. In several threads I have
> arg
I would like to help with the playground too. In several threads I have
argued about a tree/outliner like interface for organizing playgrounds
and making exploratory computation and visual data narratives. In fact I
have trying to understand how to build my own outliner from Moosee
browsers, bu
2014-06-04 11:33 GMT+02:00 Henrik Johansen :
>
> On 03 Jun 2014, at 6:32 , Camille Teruel wrote:
>
>
> On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel
> wrote:
>
> To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
> wrong ?
+100
I love this playground. Will explore it sometime.. and see if I can
participate first in building tools for use and then dive into its
frameworks ..!
To get started I will need to have a minimum of Oracle connection rather
than PostGres .. to make it worthwhile as I play with it. Any heads u
aglynn42 wrote
> ...then remember 2 arcane
> commands just to get a project built, never mind debug it
+1. Regardless of total size, uniformity is a huge win. There is simplicity
in eliminating the context switching from writing code in a language, to
configuring the build system in its own (m
On 03 Jun 2014, at 6:32 , Camille Teruel wrote:
>
> On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>>
To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
wrong ?
>>>
>>> If there is type inference t
Nicolas Passerini and Pablo Tesone are working on a type inferencer for
Pharo and this is exciting :)
On 3/6/14 17:59, Johan Fabry wrote:
On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
We have to do some type inference (for tools) some time. Should be fun. (by the
way, is there something
On Jun 3, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>
> On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>>
To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
wrong ?
>>>
>>> If there is type inferenc
On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>
>>> To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
>>> wrong ?
>>
>> If there is type inference then it is statically typed (at least partially
>> if not every
On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> We have to do some type inference (for tools) some time. Should be fun. (by
> the way, is there something like that already?)
There has been some work done on type inference for Smalltalk, the RoelTyper
example that I keep mentioning worked o
On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>> To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
>> wrong ?
>
> If there is type inference then it is statically typed (at least partially if
> not every variable type can be inferred)
To repeat myself: this is n
On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
>> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose an existing name
>> for their new programming language (interesting for a company that is very
>> careful about their own brand names), but that swift seems to be statically
>> typed
I don't think the claim is that Pharo or any Smalltalk is 'simple', but
when someone new to coding has to first learn how to pretend they're using
a late 70"s terminal and a crappy text editor, then remember 2 arcane
commands just to get a project built, never mind debug it, the price of
entry
"What makes Pharo and Smalltalk so cool is this magical simplicity on so
many levels."
I have a problem with this, I think its not sincere. I know that a Pharo
developers would love to throw on my face the basic syntax of Pharo that
can fit in a single page but the truth is that Pharo because it i
On 03 Jun 2014, at 10:53, kilon alios wrote:
> For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground demo
> here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
>
> Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has
On 03 Jun 2014, at 14:23, kilon alios wrote:
> For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground demo
> here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
>
> Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has
For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground
demo here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has generics and
optional types. So it looks like it tries to le
Hi,
The work on GToolkit goes in this direction. Funny enough, we also
have a Playground :).
Look here for an example:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/dynamic-exploration-of-a-postgres-db-with-the-gtinspector/
More will come in this direction. I happen to believe that this is the
are
On 3 juin 2014, at 09:10, Clément Bera wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objektfabrik.de :
> I remember seeing a demo of F# at an Eclipse conference a few years ago. It
> also very much reminded me of Smalltalk.
>
> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose
The big question here is not whether Pharo can implement something similar
to Playground, Moose and Roassal in particular are quite close.
The one million dollars question is Swift a live coding language or is
Swift a language with some live coding tools. Obviously I would love to be
the first opt
Clement,
Hmm, as far as I've read (and I haven't read much), all methods have an
obligatory return type.
But you can write let a = "some text", so I guess you are right. And me
probably too ;-)
Joachim
Am 03.06.14 09:10, schrieb Clément Bera:
2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objekt
Hi,
The work on GToolkit goes in this direction. Funny enough, we also have a
Playground :).
Look here for an example:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/dynamic-exploration-of-a-postgres-db-with-the-gtinspector/
More will come in this direction. I happen to believe that this is the area
with
Yeah looks cool. Just a step further, no revolution though. The fact
that for each statement Playground will immediately show its results
next to the code, makes programming a bit easier.
I wonder how/if this works for code that does not define all its values
with let statements ;-). But I gue
2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objektfabrik.de :
> I remember seeing a demo of F# at an Eclipse conference a few years ago.
> It also very much reminded me of Smalltalk.
>
> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose an existing
> name for their new programming language (intere
Here's an example of the Playground in use:
https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/recipes/xcode_help-source_editor/ExploringandEvaluatingSwiftCodeinaPlayground/ExploringandEvaluatingSwiftCodeinaPlayground.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40009975-CH26
--
View this message in context:
ht
Sent from my iPhone
> On 03 Jun 2014, at 12:03, darrinm wrote:
>
> This is the sort of thing Smalltalk seems well suited for (live coding w/
> value and iteration display). Does anyone know of something like it that has
> been done before in Smalltalk?
Look, this video was done a year ago
ht
I remember seeing a demo of F# at an Eclipse conference a few years ago.
It also very much reminded me of Smalltalk.
What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose an existing
name for their new programming language (interesting for a company that
is very careful about their own b
This is the sort of thing Smalltalk seems well suited for (live coding w/
value and iteration display). Does anyone know of something like it that has
been done before in Smalltalk?
I don't have a good link to a demonstration purely of the Playground but
there is a little info here: https://develo
29 matches
Mail list logo
