Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

On Aug 7, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Mun Mun wrote: > So I did a bit of testing (on the nominal XP system) and set back my files in > read-only mode and the result is: > > ¤ I only had troubles with PharoDebug.log and the *.changes file > ¤ If PharoDebug.log is in read-only, the image keep loading up

Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

So I did a bit of testing (on the nominal XP system) and set back my files in read-only mode and the result is: ¤ I only had troubles with PharoDebug.log and the *.changes file ¤ If PharoDebug.log is in read-only, the image keep loading up to a point I never reached. ¤ If the changes file is in re

Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

pay attention that also virus checker can think pharo is a virus because it modifies the change file. Stef On Aug 6, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Mun Mun wrote: > Hi ! > > I'm quite new to Smalltalk and and so far, I've used Pharo on a regular XP > system and everything went well. I'll add that my ima

Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Mun Mun wrote: > I found the source of the issue and it was because some files were > imported on the system in Read Only mode. Funny enough, there were allready > a PharoDebug.log from my dev environement weighting arround 20 Mo: removing > the file permited to la

Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

I found the source of the issue and it was because some files were imported on the system in Read Only mode. Funny enough, there were allready a PharoDebug.log from my dev environement weighting arround 20 Mo: removing the file permited to launch the Pharo GUI but with a lot of file opening failure

Re: [Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Mun Mun wrote: > Hi ! > > I'm quite new to Smalltalk and and so far, I've used Pharo on a regular XP > system and everything went well. I'll add that my image occupy ~40 Mo in > memory. > > I've recently tried to deploy my small app on the target system which is a

[Pharo-users] Troubles using Pharo 2.0 one-click package on a secured WinXP

Hi ! I'm quite new to Smalltalk and and so far, I've used Pharo on a regular XP system and everything went well. I'll add that my image occupy ~40 Mo in memory. I've recently tried to deploy my small app on the target system which is a very seccured package of WinXP. I can't help much on describi