Hi Stef,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:52 PM, stepharo wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/3/15 13:58, Tudor Girba a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand
>> why you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not look
>> like this. It's the opp
Le 21/3/15 13:58, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand
why you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not
look like this. It's the opposite I think.
When you "script" you want as succinct as possible (so, no mov
Hi,
I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand why
you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not look like
this. It's the opposite I think.
When you "script" you want as succinct as possible (so, no moveBehind: and
stuff). And you want to gradually
Alex
Roassal is really cool now I have one question
why we cannot say
serie1pointsAndVariations :- given
series2pointsAndVariations := given
RGrapher new
axisX; axisY;
seriesWithDeviation: {serie1pointsAndVariations .
serie2pointsAndVariations};
maxXAxis: 100;
My point is why the
Dear all,
As many of you know, Grapher is a über-cool charting engine, part of Roassal.
For people who do not know what Grapher is, here is a (compelling we hope)
example:
Which is obtained by the following script:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| b colors points ds pts dec lb |
b := RTGrapher n
