Re: [Pharo-users] Ssilence does not mean agreement

2019-09-04 Thread Richard O'Keefe
I refrain from expressing an opinion about any kind of weapon here. I would hope that in a civilised society anyone could casually mention any legal activity they engage in without being subjected to harassment. For what it's worth, I have created a GitHub site for my Smalltalk system, but there's

Re: [Pharo-users] Ssilence does not mean agreement

2019-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 4 Sep 2019, at 20:14, Herby Vojčík wrote: > > On 4. 9. 2019 20:10, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> If nobody talks casually about guns as if they are a normal part of life on >> this list I will have no problem doing so. OK, that was mean to go off list, sorry about that. I did not want

Re: [Pharo-users] Ssilence does not mean agreement

2019-09-04 Thread Herby Vojčík
On 4. 9. 2019 20:10, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: If nobody talks casually about guns as if they are a normal part of life on this list I will have no problem doing so. You are not director here. Get over your compulsion. If unable yourself, seek medical help. Herby Sven

Re: [Pharo-users] Ssilence does not mean agreement

2019-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
James, OFF LIST > On 4 Sep 2019, at 19:50, James Foster wrote: > > >> On Sep 4, 2019, at 10:22 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> I felt compelled to react since not doing so would mean I silently agree. > > Please try to get over your compulsion. If nobody talks casually about guns as if

Re: [Pharo-users] Ssilence does not mean agreement

2019-09-04 Thread James Foster
> On Sep 4, 2019, at 10:22 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I felt compelled to react since not doing so would mean I silently agree. Please try to get over your compulsion.