Re: [Pharo-users] Spec and Morphs

2014-02-16 Thread Benjamin
Indeed :) Ben On 16 Feb 2014, at 15:16, kmo wrote: > Great. Just what I wanted. Many thanks. But consider putting it in the spec > documentation - I think it's an important thing to know. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Spec-and-Morphs-tp4744084p4744109.ht

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec and Morphs

2014-02-16 Thread kmo
Great. Just what I wanted. Many thanks. But consider putting it in the spec documentation - I think it's an important thing to know. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Spec-and-Morphs-tp4744084p4744109.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.c

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec and Morphs

2014-02-16 Thread Benjamin
On 16 Feb 2014, at 14:36, kmo wrote: > I looked at Spec when it was first introduced. Then I left it alone until now > when the API is more stable. > > I seem to recall that when Spec was first introduced I was able to simply > add arbitrary Morphs to the Composable model layout. In the latest S

[Pharo-users] Spec and Morphs

2014-02-16 Thread kmo
I looked at Spec when it was first introduced. Then I left it alone until now when the API is more stable. I seem to recall that when Spec was first introduced I was able to simply add arbitrary Morphs to the Composable model layout. In the latest Spec, I do not seem able to do this. Is this just