In the section *SOUL versus PROLOG* of
http://soft.vub.ac.be/Publications/2000/vub-prog-phd-00-02.pdf, the autor
says:
When switching from SOUL to Prolog, we actually extended the SOUL system to
> export all SOUL code in Prolog format. More recent versions of the SOUL
> system include an option to
Sorry, I hate its syntax, too verbose for my taste. What about dynamic
modules, DCG, CHR, CLP, performance in general?. What about
meta-programming, operator declarations. Do you really thing SOUL is a good
replacement for Prolog?, I do not see the expressiveness of Prolog
reflected in what I have
OK I found it, I'll have a look
2013/9/25 Jesus Nuñez
> where is it??
>
>
> 2013/9/25 Stéphane Ducasse
>
>> did you look at SOUL?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Jesus Nuñez
>> wrote:
>>
>> In my very first attempt, I tried to port a package which sounds to me
>> like the one yo
where is it??
2013/9/25 Stéphane Ducasse
> did you look at SOUL?
>
> Stef
>
> On Sep 25, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Jesus Nuñez wrote:
>
> In my very first attempt, I tried to port a package which sounds to me
> like the one you describe. In the examples there was a snoopy world as a
> search example,
did you look at SOUL?
Stef
On Sep 25, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Jesus Nuñez wrote:
> In my very first attempt, I tried to port a package which sounds to me like
> the one you describe. In the examples there was a snoopy world as a search
> example, maybe you recall it from that. However I realized t
In my very first attempt, I tried to port a package which sounds to me like
the one you describe. In the examples there was a snoopy world as a search
example, maybe you recall it from that. However I realized that I didn't
want to emulate Prolog in Pharo; nothing like fast compiled and optimized
You may know about the prolog for Smalltalk/DOS of about 1990 vintage ...
I must have it on a floppy in a box somewhere on a shelf.
R
On 25 September 2013 10:29, Jesus Nuñez wrote:
> I'll try to elaborate but what I can say is only from my limited
> perspective. You can take it as an incomple
this sounds very much like a Squeak effort of mine in 1996 ;-)
Have you looked at SOUL and Qsoul-era code of Roel Wuyts ? Some of that
code was VW and Squeak as I recall.
I hope you fare better than I did in comm telco setting where identifying
resources should have been, err, of interest to mana
I'll try to elaborate but what I can say is only from my limited
perspective. You can take it as an incomplete argument that needs much
refinement, but could however serve as a seed for an upcoming idea.
Search: After all we can see the entire web as a large graph which we seek
to traverse, lookin
Am 25.09.2013 um 13:02 schrieb Jesus Nuñez :
> What did happen to Helvetia? Sorry if I am an ignorant here but I think
> language boxes in Pharo; to interac, remarkably with Prolog, would be
> definitely a plus for semantic web development in Smalltalk.
>
> Cheers
>
Sounds interesting. Can y
What did happen to Helvetia? Sorry if I am an ignorant here but I think
language boxes in Pharo; to interac, remarkably with Prolog, would be
definitely a plus for semantic web development in Smalltalk.
Cheers
2013/9/25 Norbert Hartl
> Looking for semantic web tools I found
>
> http://www.s
Looking for semantic web tools I found
http://www.squeaksource.com/TripleStore/
Are there other resources for the semantic web in pharo? smalltalk?
Norbert
12 matches
Mail list logo
