I mentioned this here and on chat several times but at last I decided to
make a video tutorial about automating the process of building images so
you don't have to install packages by hand
https://youtu.be/2J-MUsDalXw
Le 06/06/2015 14:57, Sergio Fedi a écrit :
> So getting back to Pharo's tags, I like the fact that there are some
common namings, such as many packages will have tags like "Examples", or
"Tests", however I still fail to see why would you want to put one class
into multiple tags and what the bene
+1 to subpackages as denomination for tags if they're going to be used
only to organize things hierarchically inside a package instead of used
across packages.
Cheers,
Offray
On 03/06/15 13:42, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Sergio Fedi wrote
If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply
> So getting back to Pharo's tags, I like the fact that there are some
common namings, such as many packages will have tags like "Examples", or
"Tests", however I still fail to see why would you want to put one class
into multiple tags and what the benefit would be.
In my case I have a hard time d
>
> I am not clear on the internals dealing with "tag" , but in your
> example I guess the tags needs to be associated with classes, but our
> current "tag"s are associated with a packages?
Yeah at least to me it feels that it is associated more with packages.
GT-Tests-Spotter makes a good examp
The examples you listed are awesome.
When I first saw Tags on the system browser I thought they behaved that way.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Sergio Fedi wrote:
>>> If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to
>>> something.
>> Well you sort-of can do that. Consider how many packages have tag "Tests"
>> in it. They don't need to be globally unique and it makes sense to use the
>> If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to
something.
> Well you sort-of can do that. Consider how many packages have tag "Tests"
in it. They don't need to be globally unique and it makes sense to use the
very same tag in different packages... so at least for me tag
how that would improve Pharo ?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 10:30 PM stepharo wrote:
> Guys
>
> I would not use sub-packages. Think about newbies please.
> We have packages and tags and ideally I would remove tags but we will
> not because else people will cry.
>
> Stef
>
> Le 3/6/15 12:30, Sergio Fe
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Sergio Fedi wrote:
> If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to
> something.
>
Well you sort-of can do that. Consider how many packages have tag "Tests"
in it. They don't need to be globally unique and it makes sense to use the
very s
Le 04/06/2015 21:30, stepharo a écrit :
Guys
I would not use sub-packages. Think about newbies please.
We have packages and tags and ideally I would remove tags but we will
not because else people will cry.
I would cry because I remember Pharo going through the RPackage without
tags idea and
Guys
I would not use sub-packages. Think about newbies please.
We have packages and tags and ideally I would remove tags but we will
not because else people will cry.
Stef
Le 3/6/15 12:30, Sergio Fedi a écrit :
Since Tags have a different behaviour than Packages, I think we should.
(speciall
Sergio Fedi wrote
> If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to
> something.
>
> If not, then they are, as you say, subpackages.
Agreed. Actually, tags are more interesting as they would be much more
valuable to users, who want a logical domain view of the system. Cur
I have several issues with this part of the system.
If something is a tag, then you should be able to apply multiple tags to
something.
If not, then they are, as you say, subpackages.
thanks
I dont like the name "tag" its too generic. I would prefer something like
"Create new sub-package"
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM Ben Coman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Dimitris Chloupis
> wrote:
> > In this Episode of "Pharo Video Tutorial" we take a look at "Package
> tag
Since Tags have a different behaviour than Packages, I think we should.
(specially when adding comments, which Packages support and Tags don't)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
> In this Episode of "Pharo Video Tutorial" we take a look at "Package tags"
> and how we can use them to organise our classes and packages to make our
> lives easier
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Vwg_0RMVU&list=PLqbtQ7OkSta0ULYAd7Qd
In this Episode of "Pharo Video Tutorial" we take a look at "Package tags"
and how we can use them to organise our classes and packages to make our
lives easier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Vwg_0RMVU&list=PLqbtQ7OkSta0ULYAd7Qdxof851ybh-_m_&index=25
Great! I just learn about Window group with your vidorials
Thanks
Hilaire
Le 22/06/2014 00:00, kilon alios a écrit :
> I have uploaded 5 new video tutorials to my playlist that can be found here
>
--
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
iStoa - https://launchpad.net/istoa
Thank you Tudor and Esteban .
I have uploaded 5 new video tutorials to my playlist that can be found here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol5ivaEATLQ&list=PLqbtQ7OkSta0ULYAd7Qdxof851ybh-_m_
1) Why Pharo
2) Install Pharo
3) Create a Class
4) Workspace Variables
5) Instance Variables
6) Temporary
supercool kilon, thank you very much!
Esteban
On 15 May 2014, at 18:36, kilon alios wrote:
> As you may or may not be aware of I have started a series of Video Tutorials
> that I upload to YouTube. I also add these tutorials to my "Pharo Video
> Tutorial" playlist. Since the last time I poste
Excellent!
Doru
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:36 PM, kilon alios wrote:
> As you may or may not be aware of I have started a series of Video
> Tutorials that I upload to YouTube. I also add these tutorials to my "Pharo
> Video Tutorial" playlist. Since the last time I posted I have added 9 new
> t
As you may or may not be aware of I have started a series of Video
Tutorials that I upload to YouTube. I also add these tutorials to my "Pharo
Video Tutorial" playlist. Since the last time I posted I have added 9 new
tutorials. The playlist is now 2 hours and 22 minutes long and of course
there is
23 matches
Mail list logo
