Re: [Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

2015-02-16 21:55 GMT+01:00 Thierry Goubier : > Now, Morphic is so much more powerfull... that we mostly underuse it with > basic widgets. > +1000 > > Thierry > >

Re: [Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

Hi Sebastian, yes, I think some of it is interesting, and the way he focuses on a few benchmarks is not a bad way of classifying GUIs (and toolkits). You just have to remember that his focus is a lot more limited than expected at start: " ... In this thesis we want to investigate if the conc

Re: [Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

Well yes, but is even worst that it doesn’t even mention Douglas Engelbart’s work which is the widely know and hugely influential The Mother of All Demos . But the part that is important and I think is valid is the one that shows gradually how a GUI

Re: [Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

Sebastian, Thanks for sharing this. I found the thesis interesting. There are several points that are worth take into account: He says when analyzing the possible outcomes of his thesis that: "Putting paradigms aside, another possible outcome is that the language’s, the IDE’s and/or the toolkit’s

Re: [Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

Hi Sebastian, a guy which starts by saying that no GUI toolkit of significance were written in FP, and forget to link or cite Garnet (by B. Myers) (Common Lisp) is, how to say, intriguing. Doesn't bode well for the well researched :( Thierry Le 15/02/2015 14:08, Sebastian Sastre a écrit :

[Pharo-users] On GUI design and how to benchmark it

Hi guys, I saw the interest in GUI lately and today I come across this really well researched master thesis paper that can put some light on how good we can perform in the GUI spectrum in terms of practicality, expressivity and productivity Introduction Even though OOP was born with the SIMU