Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-16 Thread Usman Bhatti
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Actually, I did read, but what I understood is only that I should look for > another URL do download PharoS :). > > In any case, thanks a lot. I tried with the Pharo VM and it works as > expected, too. I set it to 1GB and got the warning only

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-16 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 16 Jul 2013, at 11:33, Tudor Girba wrote: > Actually, I did read, but what I understood is only that I should look for > another URL do download PharoS :). > > In any case, thanks a lot. I tried with the Pharo VM and it works as > expected, too. I set it to 1GB and got the warning only whe

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-16 Thread Tudor Girba
Actually, I did read, but what I understood is only that I should look for another URL do download PharoS :). In any case, thanks a lot. I tried with the Pharo VM and it works as expected, too. I set it to 1GB and got the warning only when the image went passed that limit. Cheers, Doru On Mon,

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 15 July 2013 16:59, Tudor Girba wrote: > Aha :). > > Ok. I tested PharoS with 1GB and I got a 800MB image running well. > > Is there really no chance of getting Cog with this feature? :) > please ,read more carefully.. :) it was error in config, which copied PharoS files over Pharo ones. And an

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-07-15, at 17:00, Tudor Girba wrote: > Aha :). > > Ok. I tested PharoS with 1GB and I got a 800MB image running well. > > Is there really no chance of getting Cog with this feature? :) should be the same setting for both Pharo and PharoS (note there is no more Cog, NBCog and StackVM ;

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Tudor Girba
Aha :). Ok. I tested PharoS with 1GB and I got a 800MB image running well. Is there really no chance of getting Cog with this feature? :) Doru On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 15 July 2013 15:34, Damien Cassou wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tudor Gir

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 15 July 2013 15:34, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Ok, I admit. I should read emails thoroughly :). Please ignore the second >> issue. Still, why is it called PharoS? > > > may it be because this is a StackVM and not Cog? yeah, it looks like Este

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-07-15, at 15:35, Damien Cassou wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: >> Ok, I admit. I should read emails thoroughly :). Please ignore the second >> issue. Still, why is it called PharoS? > > > may it be because this is a StackVM and not Cog? StackVM renameAs:

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Damien Cassou
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Ok, I admit. I should read emails thoroughly :). Please ignore the second > issue. Still, why is it called PharoS? may it be because this is a StackVM and not Cog? -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the abili

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Tudor Girba
Ok, I admit. I should read emails thoroughly :). Please ignore the second issue. Still, why is it called PharoS? Doru On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > I am trying the vm now, and I have a couple of issues: > - Why is the executable named PharoS instead of Pharo? > - There

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-15 Thread Tudor Girba
I am trying the vm now, and I have a couple of issues: - Why is the executable named PharoS instead of Pharo? - There is no .ini file in the archive. In the older one, I have the following contents in the Pharo.ini: [Global] DeferUpdate=1 ShowConsole=0 DynamicConsole=1 ReduceCPUUsage=1 ReduceCPUInB

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-13 Thread Tudor Girba
Thank you, indeed! Doru On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Thanks igor. > > On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >> So, after spending unproportionally huge time (2days) dealing with >> jenkins config idiosyncrasies, >> it finally managed to build it. >>

Re: [Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-13 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Thanks igor. On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > So, after spending unproportionally huge time (2days) dealing with > jenkins config idiosyncrasies, > it finally managed to build it. > > http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/win/latest.zip > > This VM should react properly on > Addre

[Pharo-users] New win32 VM available (was: More than 500MB for windows)

2013-07-11 Thread Igor Stasenko
So, after spending unproportionally huge time (2days) dealing with jenkins config idiosyncrasies, it finally managed to build it. http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/win/latest.zip This VM should react properly on AddressSpaceLimit= setting in .ini file. The ini file is located in same directory as V