> On 20 Mar 2017, at 16:34, denker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a slice that implements the #argsAsArray option:
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19857/add-option-argsAsArray
>
> from a speed perspective, the question is if a dictionary makes sense… as it
> would
> need to be creat
Hi,
Here is a slice that implements the #argsAsArray option:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19857/add-option-argsAsArray
from a speed perspective, the question is if a dictionary makes sense… as it
would
need to be created at runtime.
Marcus
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 11:25, de
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 11:09, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:49:51AM +0100, denker wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Mar 2017, at 10:35, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is it possible to create a metalink on arbitrary amount of arguments?
>>>
>>> Right now the metaObject and selec
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:49:51AM +0100, denker wrote:
>
> > On 15 Mar 2017, at 10:35, Peter Uhnak wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to create a metalink on arbitrary amount of arguments?
> >
> > Right now the metaObject and selector must have the same number of
> > arguments, e.g.
>
> On 15 Mar 2017, at 10:35, Peter Uhnak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to create a metalink on arbitrary amount of arguments?
>
> Right now the metaObject and selector must have the same number of arguments,
> e.g.
>
> MetaLink new
> metaObject: [ :object :selector :args | ... ];
>
Hi,
is it possible to create a metalink on arbitrary amount of arguments?
Right now the metaObject and selector must have the same number of arguments,
e.g.
MetaLink new
metaObject: [ :object :selector :args | ... ];
selector: #value:value:value;
arguments: #(object sele
