> On 05 Apr 2015, at 10:46, Thierry Goubier wrote:
>
> Le 04/04/2015 18:02, stepharo a écrit :
>> Thierry
>>
>> this means that generating ring objects would help you?
>
> Maybe. Or maybe unifying Ring with what RB already does with its models
> (RBClass, etc...), and ensuring that Opal can w
2015-04-05 15:07 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman :
>
> What would be exciting is in a "host-image" being able to generate an
> empty special-object Root-Object (like is held by the VM) as a guest-image
> inside the host-image, so you can push core elements into it until the
> guest is a running minimal-image
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:01 AM, stepharo wrote:
>
>
> Le 30/3/15 09:10, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>
> On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo wrote:
>>>
>>> Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in
>>> an environment (that can be the default one) but that can be the on
Le 04/04/2015 18:02, stepharo a écrit :
Thierry
this means that generating ring objects would help you?
Maybe. Or maybe unifying Ring with what RB already does with its models
(RBClass, etc...), and ensuring that Opal can work with those (at least
do the bindings part, count the literals, et
Le 30/3/15 09:10, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo wrote:
Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in an
environment (that can be the default one) but that can be the one
I want and specified from the outside of the compiler.
For instal
Thierry
this means that generating ring objects would help you?
I guess so.
stef
Le 30/3/15 16:25, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
A use case:
the ability to test and debug the code generation part of SmaCC.
SmaCC, when compiling a parser, generates dozens of classes and
hundreds of methods, some
Hi Johan,
thanks, i see how it works and removes the object later.
werner
On 03/30/2015 06:42 PM, Johan Fabry wrote:
Here is a class that can be of use for you then :-)
Here is a class that can be of use for you then :-)
It’s a bit more complicated than what you need exactly, because I have lexical
scoping and subscopes et cetera, but you can ignore that really. The relevant
methods for you are generateNamedClass:withSuper: and compileBlock:forScope:
Success!
Ok, I noted all the use cases.
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 16:25, Thierry Goubier wrote:
>
> A use case:
>
> the ability to test and debug the code generation part of SmaCC.
>
> SmaCC, when compiling a parser, generates dozens of classes and hundreds of
> methods, some of those very long, as a sequ
Hi Johan,
you did surprise me! thanks for that info, i can use that indeed.
werner
On 03/30/2015 04:47 PM, Johan Fabry wrote:
Werner, let me surprise you: what I am doing is in the end exactly that! :-) ...
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:01, Werner Kassens wrote:
>
> i had a little program, that constructs an array of blocks (no object
> methods) via opal from scratch (using strings). now this worked of course
> without problems, but there are situations where it would be nice if those
> blocks would
A use case:
the ability to test and debug the code generation part of SmaCC.
SmaCC, when compiling a parser, generates dozens of classes and hundreds of
methods, some of those very long, as a sequence of refactorings (and
optimise them).
Then SmaCC apply them all in one step.
I'd dream of havin
On 03/30/2015 09:10 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
What the compiler does not have is to look up references e.g. to symbols
regarding to an environment, but that is because we
don’t have that concept right now in the system in general. globals/class vars
are requested from the class (which defines it
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 09:23, Christophe Demarey
> wrote:
>
>
> Le 30 mars 2015 à 09:10, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>
>>
>>> On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo wrote:
>>>
>>> Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in an
>>> environment (that can be the default o
Le 30 mars 2015 à 09:10, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>
>> On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo wrote:
>>
>> Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in an
>> environment (that can be the default one) but that can be the one
>> I want and specified from the outside of th
> On 29 Mar 2015, at 10:32, stepharo wrote:
>
> Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in an
> environment (that can be the default one) but that can be the one
> I want and specified from the outside of the compiler.
For installing, it is the ClassInstaller that
Before that I would like that the compiler outputs classes definition in
an environment (that can be the default one) but that can be the one
I want and specified from the outside of the compiler.
May be this is already the case
Stef
Le 28/3/15 23:03, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 28 Mar 2015, a
> On Mar 28, 2015, at 19:03, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>
>> On 28 Mar 2015, at 20:05, Johan Fabry wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:06, stepharo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the
> On 28 Mar 2015, at 20:05, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:06, stepharo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>> I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the
>>> .changes is not only a transaction log, but in addition
>>>
Thanks Ben for the pointer! In the end it’s doing +- the same things I had
already figured out don’t really work though. So I guess it’ll have to wait
until thorough support is implemented.
> On Mar 28, 2015, at 14:45, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> Not sure if it is silent enough for you, but perhaps
> On Mar 28, 2015, at 08:06, stepharo wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>> I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the
>> .changes is not only a transaction log, but in addition
>> the place where the source of a method is stored.
>>
>> I wou
Not sure if it is silent enough for you, but perhaps have a look at use of
ClassFactoryForTestCase.
cheers -ben
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Johan Fabry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for LRP I am auto generating classes and methods, and removing them when I
> no longer need them. This however produce
Le 28/3/15 08:53, Marcus Denker a écrit :
I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the .changes
is not only a transaction log, but in addition
the place where the source of a method is stored.
I would like to
-> make transaction log + source storage independent.
->
I think we have not yet any good API for this… one problem is that the .changes
is not only a transaction log, but in addition
the place where the source of a method is stored.
I would like to
-> make transaction log + source storage independent.
-> add a kind of “virtual” package for these gene
Hi,
As far as I know the source code is not stored in the image, but in the changes
file. So from that perspective the changes files is more than just logs, it
actually store our code, so not recording that entry would be similar as having
a method without the actual code.
Maybe a possible solu
Hi all,
for LRP I am auto generating classes and methods, and removing them when I no
longer need them. This however produces a lot of entries in the change file
that are not needed at all. So I am looking into generating and removing them
silently, however with not much success. Can anybody he
26 matches
Mail list logo
