Re: [Pharo-users] HTTP Header field handling in Zinc

2013-07-27 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Udo, On 27 Jul 2013, at 12:50, Udo Schneider wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On 27.07.13 00:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> Be sure to tell the websocketpp guys about this issue ;-) > Already did. Good. > The fact that websocketpp based apps return with 500 is even "funnier" IMHO… :-) >> A quick

Re: [Pharo-users] HTTP Header field handling in Zinc

2013-07-27 Thread Udo Schneider
Hi Sven, On 27.07.13 00:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: Be sure to tell the websocketpp guys about this issue ;-) Already did. The fact that websocketpp based apps return with 500 is even "funnier" IMHO... A quick hack from our side would be to bypass the normal protocol of ZnHeader (spec

Re: [Pharo-users] HTTP Header field handling in Zinc

2013-07-26 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
Hi Udo, On 26 Jul 2013, at 22:54, Udo Schneider wrote: > All, > > Is there a supported way to change the capitalization of HTTP header fields > in Zinc? I'm currently running into problems with a websocketpp > (https://github.com/zaphoyd/websocketpp) based backend which expects a > specifica

[Pharo-users] HTTP Header field handling in Zinc

2013-07-26 Thread Udo Schneider
All, Is there a supported way to change the capitalization of HTTP header fields in Zinc? I'm currently running into problems with a websocketpp (https://github.com/zaphoyd/websocketpp) based backend which expects a specifically capitalized Sec-WebSocket-* header field. E.g. Sec-WebSocket-* w