Le 8/4/15 14:41, kilon alios a écrit :
probably I kinda cheat, I use the smalltalkhub repo as nothing more
than a shell for my github repo. I commit to it only my configuration
which in turn loads the code from github . I have done this with
Ephestos and Nireas , the configuration browsers en
EstebanLM wrote
> why would you want another format form mirroring?
For the case when one is only actually committing to e.g. StHub and then
mirroring to GitHub for external visibility, the purpose is not served when
a casual observer must drill down several levels to view each method
individually
Le 08/04/2015 17:16, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
On 08/04/15 14:38, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I don’t know your problem… why would you want another format form
mirroring?
Because with packages the size of Roassal2 you might get rather unhappy
on a machine without an SSD. That is a lot of files.
On 08/04/15 14:38, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I don’t know your problem… why would you want another format form mirroring?
Because with packages the size of Roassal2 you might get rather unhappy
on a machine without an SSD. That is a lot of files.
Stephan
probably I kinda cheat, I use the smalltalkhub repo as nothing more than a
shell for my github repo. I commit to it only my configuration which in
turn loads the code from github . I have done this with Ephestos and Nireas
, the configuration browsers entries just load the baseline from my github
r
I don’t know your problem… why would you want another format form mirroring?
Esteban
> On 08 Apr 2015, at 14:07, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> Bump :)
>
>
> Sean P. DeNigris wrote
>> for the "Mirror on Github" use case, I wonder if less granularity wouldn't
>> clearly be more appropriate. I rea
Bump :)
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> for the "Mirror on Github" use case, I wonder if less granularity wouldn't
> clearly be more appropriate. I read about using chunk format (not ideal,
> but perhaps a bit more readable on the mirror) via Gitocello, but loading
> in Pharo 4.0 broke on the FFI depend
stepharo wrote
> be able to publish in parallel from Smalltalkhub and github
Cool :)
I've been thinking... FileTree's method-resolution may be The Right Thing To
Do when using git for SCM (I know we've debated before). But... for the
"Mirror on Github" use case, I wonder if less granularity would
Esteban is working on extending SmalltalkHub or providing some nice
scripts to be able to publish in parallel from Smalltalkhub and github.
Le 7/3/15 21:46, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
Does anyone have a good workflow for mirroring a repo with GitHub? Do you
just copy the MC version to a GitFil
Does anyone have a good workflow for mirroring a repo with GitHub? Do you
just copy the MC version to a GitFileTree repo after every commit to e.g.
SmalltalkHub? via the MC Browser UI? Thanks.
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/GitHub-Mirror-Workflow-tp481
10 matches
Mail list logo
