On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:44:06PM +1000, vin...@gmail.com wrote:
> VoyageMongo looks interesting. PostgreSQL is supported too. Do either of
> these work through FFI?
On SqueakSource, PostgresV2, PostgresV3, MySQL and StdbCore (for MySQL) are
pure Smalltalk implementations of the respective wire p
elease) so you can make
only one concurrent non-blocking call.
Dale
- Original Message -
| From: vin...@gmail.com
| To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
| Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:44:06 AM
| Subject: [Pharo-users] Databases for Pharo that do not use FFI
|
| Hello
|
| I have been
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I have been tinkering with Pharo long enough now to contemplate writing
> a "serious" applications with it. An important consideration is databases.
>
> Esteban will start to work on the thre
> Hello
>
> I have been tinkering with Pharo long enough now to contemplate writing a
> "serious" applications with it. An important consideration is databases.
Esteban will start to work on the threaded vm with eliot for such typical case.
> I have been looking at SQLite but realise since it
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:44 AM, wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have been tinkering with Pharo long enough now to contemplate writing a
> "serious" applications with it. An important consideration is databases. I
> have been looking at SQLite but realise since it works through FFI it
> probably blocks the
Hello
I have been tinkering with Pharo long enough now to contemplate writing a
"serious" applications with it. An important consideration is databases. I have
been looking at SQLite but realise since it works through FFI it probably
blocks the VM whilst processing a query. Is this correct?
Vo