Re: [Pharo-users] Bitbucket CI

2017-09-03 Thread Peter Uhnák
I am familiar neither with BuildCI nor pharo-build, nor was I aware that they would be popular/used/ready-to-use as SmalltalkCI On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Peter Uhnák wrote > > SmalltalkCI... you should be able to run it on any linux box > > Thanks. I got it workin

Re: [Pharo-users] Bitbucket CI

2017-09-02 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Peter Uhnák wrote > SmalltalkCI... you should be able to run it on any linux box Thanks. I got it working locally fairly easily. During my investigation, I noticed that SmalltalkCI seems to be based on BuildCI, which is in turn built on pharo-builder. I can't help but wonder why so many frameworks

Re: [Pharo-users] Bitbucket CI

2017-09-01 Thread Peter Uhnák
> "Travis support" SmalltalkCI is somewhat more integrated with Travis, so it streamlines usage quite a bit; however the main part of it is still SmalltalkCI, and you should be able to run it on any linux box (even locally). I use it on GitLab ( https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/issues/262 )

Re: [Pharo-users] Bitbucket CI

2017-09-01 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hi Sean - haven't looked at BitBucket specifically, but these days they all seem to use a yaml config file. If you want something custom, look at the one I use in PharoLambda - it's using GitLab (which also has private repos), but I suspect BitBucket is probably similar. I don't use SmalltalkC

[Pharo-users] Bitbucket CI

2017-08-31 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I know we have Travis support for GH. Does anyone have glue for CI-Support in BitBucket? I'm specifically wondering about private repos… - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html