Thanks for pointing out the relationship. I had actually been looking
for an implementation of the old OOPSLA paper intermittently over a few
months. Never would have occurred to me that this is one. The curse of
coy package names...
On 15/10/2019 3:50, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
What is the
gcotelli wrote
> I don't know if call it canonical. But certainly it is the version the
> community is maintaining.
That works for me. I guess I'll re-fork from there. Hopefully, some of the
other repo owners will speak up as to whether they have useful changes to
pick up.
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
I don't know if call it canonical. But certainly it is the version the
community is maintaining. It's a fork of the mtaborda repo and converted to
tonel format. I don't know how it was migrated from Sthub, but it was
before any tool for migrating the history existed.
I think it must contain all th
What is the relation with Units maintained by Zweindenker?
On Mon 14 Oct 2019 at 19:13, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua
>
> I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are
> two other repos on StHub [3]
To slightly further complicate matters, canonical does not quite have all
commits from its predecessor.
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
It seems that this is now canonical: https://github.com/ba-st/aconcagua
I assume its predecessor [1] was a port from this StHub repo [2]. There are
two other repos on StHub [3] - the first of which has changes after the last
in [1] and the other has changes which may have been/need to be merged. C
