Please Damien :)
You know, I first dumping and after revisiting.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Damien Pollet wrote:
> I just went through it and saw a few possible tweaks (you know me). I'll
> commit them directly if I get the time
>
> On 8 January 2017 at 20:50, Alexandre Bergel
> wrote:
>
>
I just went through it and saw a few possible tweaks (you know me). I'll
commit them directly if I get the time
On 8 January 2017 at 20:50, Alexandre Bergel
wrote:
> Okay!
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> > On Jan 8, 2017, at 4:34 PM, stepharong wrote:
> >
> > fixed.
> > Alex
> > this chapter alone is reall
Okay!
Alexandre
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 4:34 PM, stepharong wrote:
>
> fixed.
> Alex
> this chapter alone is really nice to present OOP and OOD and Pharo to people
> can start.
> I'm adding some points to answer question raised by my son and it will be
> ready to rest.
>
> Stef
--
_,.;:~^~:;
fixed.
Alex
this chapter alone is really nice to present OOP and OOD and Pharo to
people can start.
I'm adding some points to answer question raised by my son and it will be
ready to rest.
Stef
excellent catch :)
On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:02:01 +0100, Alexandre Bergel
wrote:
Hi Stef!
You have written a lot of material. This is great!
I had a look at the chapter about the interpreter. Looks great!
Figure 17.3 Multiplication>>evaluate It should be “*”, not “+"
Alexandre
On Jan
Hi sven
for now I'm dumping what I have in my head. Once I will finish to "vomit"
I will redo a full pass.
Looks very promising. It is a great, much needed subject area. And a
huge task as well.
I personally like chapter 7 as introduction, a lot, in terms of
conceptual approach. If it w
Looks very promising. It is a great, much needed subject area. And a huge task
as well.
I personally like chapter 7 as introduction, a lot, in terms of conceptual
approach. If it were me, I would put it first (but the current intro reflects
that already a bit, so I am not sure).
Also, personal
Hi Stef!
You have written a lot of material. This is great!
I had a look at the chapter about the interpreter. Looks great!
Figure 17.3 Multiplication>>evaluate It should be “*”, not “+"
Alexandre
> On Jan 8, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>
> I released a version of a little e
I released a version of a little expression interpreter for the new book:
Object-oriented programming and design with Pharo.
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Books/job/LearningObjectOrientedProgramming/63/artifact/book.pdf
Typos are welcome as pull requests.
Stef
