Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] TTFB, Apache, Seaside Performance Problem

2017-01-05 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 05.01.2017 um 16:04 schrieb Sabine Manaa : > > @Norbert, concerning your last post, ip4/ip6: is there any disadvantage when > choosing your option1 (using 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost) instead of the > others? > No, even if you would make spesenfuchs.de reachabl

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] TTFB, Apache, Seaside Performance Problem

2017-01-05 Thread p...@highoctane.be
Seems to be some trouble with the Seaside list as I replied at 12:44 but it is like it wasn't shown or something. "Did you try with 127.0.0.1 instead of localhost? I see you are on Windows and I got some issues like that. Phil" On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Your di

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] TTFB, Apache, Seaside Performance Problem

2017-01-05 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 05.01.2017 um 13:41 schrieb jtuc...@objektfabrik.de: > > Am 05.01.17 um 13:34 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe: >> I think this has to do with your particular server setup (Windows, Apache on >> Windows ?), there normally should not be any real difference (caching of DNS >> results). I am usi

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] TTFB, Apache, Seaside Performance Problem

2017-01-05 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Am 05.01.17 um 13:34 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe: I think this has to do with your particular server setup (Windows, Apache on Windows ?), there normally should not be any real difference (caching of DNS results). I am using localhost as upstream server reference everywhere (Linux mostly Ngi