--- Begin Message ---
Nice work.
Doru
> On Dec 30, 2018, at 10:13 PM, Stephane Ducasse
> wrote:
>
> Hello Fellow Pharoers
>
> I'm happy to announce a new little book to improve the culture around Pharo.
> I will revise it in the future so you can feel free to send feedback
> and pull reques
--- Begin Message ---
That is a useful contribution, thank you (again) for your efforts !
> On 30 Dec 2018, at 22:13, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>
> Hello Fellow Pharoers
>
> I'm happy to announce a new little book to improve the culture around Pharo.
> I will revise it in the future so you can fe
--- Begin Message ---
I’ve always felt the XP book nailed it - don’t use comments as a crutch to
avoid fixing confusing code and don’t do work twice by simply writing a comment
that says the same as the code. (You can of course try to write the comment and
auto-generate the code, but we’ve tried
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Richard,
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 07:26, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> To get an example, I did (String allSelectors atRandom), getting
> #copyWithoutAll:. That has only one definition, in Collection:
>copyWithoutAll: aCollection
> "Answer a copy of the receiver th
I'm not sure that the advice on method comments is as good as it could be.
Consider Point >>
setX: xValue setY: yValue
x := xValue.
y := yValue
It is pretty obvious what this does, and if I'm reading chapter 4 correctly
the advice is that it doesn't need a comment. But it does: why DOESN'T th
On naming protocols: it would be nice to have clear guidance about
when to use '-ion' and when to use '-ing'. In my own code I've been
using '-ing' except for a few traditional categories like
'instance creation'. One reason for this was that I didn't want to
keep on re-deciding "is it 'enumerati
--- Begin Message ---
Besides, I forgot to add one comment : you should have guidelines for
protocol naming. It's not critical per se but I find it quite annoying
to look for stuff in "enumerating" when it's been put in "printing" ! loll
On 2018-12-31 03:51, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks! T
