Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Sorry, I missed a >>NOT< Ben Coman wrote > > It guess it should >>NOT<< impede someone using their account as a > staging point > > for migrating from Smalltalkhub projects to a community github repo. > > Two possible options

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Ben Coman wrote > It guess it should impede someone using their account as a staging point > for migrating from Smalltalkhub projects to a community github repo. Two possible options: 1. (maybe the cleanest and what I did for Artefact) - create a repo under one's own account, which can then be pul

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

> Am 11.10.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > > > >> On 11 Oct 2018, at 14:21, Ben Coman > > wrote: >> >> So this is more a problem for repos that have lived a long time already on >> github? >> It guess it should impede someone using their account as a

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

> On 11 Oct 2018, at 14:21, Ben Coman wrote: > > So this is more a problem for repos that have lived a long time already on > github? > It guess it should impede someone using their account as a staging point for > migrating from Smalltalkhub projects to a community github repo. > > Although

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

So this is more a problem for repos that have lived a long time already on github? It guess it should impede someone using their account as a staging point for migrating from Smalltalkhub projects to a community github repo. Although an alternate way to consider this is that the forwarding submerg

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Well, you can but then the access is not forwarded anymore to the repo you‘ve transferred. Transferring and forking makes everyone link something they maybe don‘t want. Transferring and creating a new one with the same name brings all request to the former to your new repo which is unlikely to b

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Why not? > On 10 Oct 2018, at 17:55, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > No, that you cannot > >> Am 10.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris : >> >> NorbertHartl wrote >>> The rest is provided by github as long as you do not create a new >>> repository with the same name. >> >> Can you still fork t

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

No, that you cannot > Am 10.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Sean P. DeNigris : > > NorbertHartl wrote >> The rest is provided by github as long as you do not create a new >> repository with the same name. > > Can you still fork the transferred repo in your personal account? I wasn't > sure, which is wh

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

NorbertHartl wrote > The rest is provided by github as long as you do not create a new > repository with the same name. Can you still fork the transferred repo in your personal account? I wasn't sure, which is why I didn't handle Artefact this way. - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

If you go on github under settings there is a item „transfer ownership“. The rest is provided by github as long as you do not create a new repository with the same name. Norbert > Am 10.10.2018 um 13:47 schrieb Esteban Maringolo : > > Thank you Norbert. > > How do to achieve the forwarding o

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Thank you Norbert. How do to achieve the forwarding of the old repo to the new one? Esteban A. Maringolo El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 7:37, Norbert Hartl () escribió: > > Just a note that I moved the repository > > https://github.com/zweidenker/Cryptography > > to > > https://github.com/pharo-co

[Pharo-users] [ANN] Cryptography moved to pharo-contributions

Just a note that I moved the repository https://github.com/zweidenker/Cryptography to https://github.com/pharo-contributions/Cryptography It is better suited there. Access to the old URL will st