How about we just move on?
Thanks. I have responded in private to persons who asked for it, to not
further flood the list.
To close this thread, I feel it may be necessary to say something
conciliatory: So, apology to Richard for being rude and loud. I was
pushing for reactions, and sinc
x, but somehow we are not
yet there :( )
Esteban
On 3 Mar 2019, at 17:52, Michael Zeder
wrote:
Hi!
I would like to make two offers:
First, I know, deciding to be provocative can hurt. I did it int the
hope that the released energy will be transformed in something good
by the community, so ap
Hi!
I would like to make two offers:
First, I know, deciding to be provocative can hurt. I did it int the
hope that the released energy will be transformed in something good by
the community, so apology for having been loud and insistent.
Second, I felt oblidged to give at least a little thing
money, than this is the opposite of
altruistic... Again, maybe a cultural thing.
But yes, I like to see becoming this a success story.
Thank you! M
Am Fr, 1. Mär, 2019 um 6:15 NACHMITTAGS schrieb Ben Coman
:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your thoughtful followup.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 19:59, Michae
@Esteban: Thanks for your balanced answer. got it. But I get back to
the point of "silencing/ban" (which is not my suggestion).
@Eduardo: Right, sorry, this should have been more clearly (and I did
not want to be condescending towards newcomers). Soft skills and people
who create articles, tut
o the actual work, claims credits, insults people, then this person is
not fit to be part of this community. It sheds a very bad light onto
us. --> If R.K. Eng cannot respect community structure and decisions,
we should exclude him officially and publicly take distance from this
person.
Thank you for your attention.
Michael Zeder
