Re: [Pharo-users] Smallest docker image for pharo >=7 ?

2019-10-18 Thread Jan van de Sandt
have 20 images you have 20 times the heap. > So a small image is actually important. The vm is different. It is the same > static file which will be paged into shared memory and the vm binary should > be shared for all 20 runtimes. But the interpreter memory will not be > shared so a small vm pays out as well. > >> > >> Norbert > >> > > > > > > > -- Jan van de Sandt gsm: +31 (0)6 3039 5998

Re: [Pharo-users] AWS libraries

2016-11-10 Thread Jan van de Sandt
Hi, The Cloudfork code is available on SmalltalkHub: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~JanVanDeSandt/Cloudfork I'm afraid the code is a bit outdated by now. I have not used in the last three years. It has support for S3, SQS and SimpleDB. Jan. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, François Stephany < tuli

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo days 2016, driving from the Netherlands

2016-03-28 Thread Jan van de Sandt
Hi Stephan, I would have been interested. But I ordered my train ticket last night. Jan. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > I've been looking at options to get to Namur from the Netherlands. > My current plans are to drive by car from Den Bosch on thursday > morning,

Re: [Pharo-users] Most recent version of CloudforkAWS for Pharo?

2014-12-21 Thread Jan van de Sandt
Hi, You can find the most recent edition of CloadforkAWS here http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~JanVanDeSandt/Cloudfork/ Jan. On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Udo Schneider wrote: > All, > > which is the most recent version of CloudforkAWS for Pharo? > > Thanks, > > Udo > > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Two progress bars for each progress in #20623?

2013-10-14 Thread Jan van de Sandt
I experienced exactly the same problem On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > mmm... can someone confirm this as a bug? (I cannot :( ) > > just to see if we have to catch a bug or a particular problem in your > image :) > > Esteban > > On Oct 13, 2013, at 4:51 PM, MartinW w