[Pharo-users] [ANN] docker-pharo-runtime v11.0.0-2024-04-18 [v11.0.0 [2024-04-18]] released!

2024-04-18 Thread Buenos Aires Smalltalk
docker-pharo-runtime, docker image for Pharo reached it's v11.0.0-2024-04-18 version. What's Changed Update VM to v10.1.0 by @gcotelli in https://github.com/ba-st/docker-pharo-runtime/pull/17 Full Changelog: https://github.com/ba-st/docker-pharo-runtime/compare/v11.0.0-2023-10-25…v11.0.0-2024-04-

[Pharo-users] [ANN] docker-pharo-vm v10.1.0-2024-04-18 [v10.1.0 [2024-04-18]] released!

2024-04-18 Thread Buenos Aires Smalltalk
docker-pharo-vm, docker image for Pharo VM reached it's v10.1.0-2024-04-18 version. What's Changed Update actions versions by @gcotelli in https://github.com/ba-st/docker-pharo-vm/pull/13 Update Pharo VM to v10.1.0 by @gcotelli in https://github.com/ba-st/docker-pharo-vm/pull/14 Upgrade Debian bas

[Pharo-users] Re: How to log pharo output to stdio safely?

2024-04-18 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Just as a comment on this - I tried using #sync as an experiment and I get a primFailed on an Ubuntu docker image - so I think that comment in the image is misleading (or its a bug, or unfinished work) On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, at 11:15 AM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > Hi Stef - I was aware of that class

[Pharo-users] Re: How to log pharo output to stdio safely?

2024-04-18 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hi Stef - I was aware of that class - but a good reminder to re-read it for any extra info, but I don't see anything in particular mentioned about how data is flushed - and I think this is one of those black arts from in the field. It looks like stdio uses an Stdiostream - and I did note an inte