[Pharo-users] Re: String concatenation performance

The test is using string literals, which may be optimized in various ways. Is that representative of your use case? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 3:12 PM Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > I thought streamContents: was faster than using a comma binary message... > > I was wrong. Pharo is not Java :-) > > Noury

[Pharo-users] String concatenation performance

> I thought streamContents: was faster than using a comma binary message... I was wrong. Pharo is not Java :-) Noury "Run in P11" a := 'a'. > b := 'b'. > c := 'c'. > d := 'd'. > e := 'ee'. > [ a , b , c , d , e ] bench. > "'395.090 per second'" > "'3808242.503 per second'"

[Pharo-users] This week (11/2024) on the Pharo Issue Tracker

With the freeze, we will see now less PRs being integrated, most of them fixes and tests. If you see bugs in Pharo 12, make sure to check that it is reported on the issue tracker! # Fixes - fix calypso close button #16295 https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/16295 - Fi