[Pharo-users] Re: Wow - Chat GPT understands Smalltalk

2023-03-22 Thread in_pharo_users--- via Pharo-users
Dear James, anonymity may not be important to presenting these ideas in general, but I prefer to stay pseudonymous in this case. On 22.3.2023 at 4:16 PM, "James Foster via Pharo-users" wrote: > >Are you willing to sign your name to this? Is anonymity important >to presenting these ideas? >

[Pharo-users] Re: Wow - Chat GPT understands Smalltalk

2023-03-22 Thread James Foster via Pharo-users
Are you willing to sign your name to this? Is anonymity important to presenting these ideas? James Foster > On Mar 22, 2023, at 5:34 AM, in_pharo_users--- via Pharo-users > wrote: > > Offray, and to all others, > > you are missing the issue. > > The problem we face is not to measure 'intel

[Pharo-users] Re: Wow - Chat GPT understands Smalltalk

2023-03-22 Thread in_pharo_users--- via Pharo-users
Offray, and to all others, you are missing the issue. The problem we face is not to measure 'intelligence' of a system, but it's ability to verbally act indistinguishable from a human. This ability is allready given as chatbots are accepted by millions of users, f.i. as user interfaces. (meas