[Pharo-users] Re: exercism bowling challenge

2020-09-25 Thread DavidBajger
Thanks for your reply! Anyway.. wow, 3 lines of code, I'd like to see that! I didn't really get into FLP (except some small howeworks on University and that's alraeady forgotten), so I don't know, what is the advantage here. I thought that Pharo (Smalltalk) can be considered as functional language

[Pharo-users] Re: exercism bowling challenge

2020-09-25 Thread Roelof Wobben via Pharo-users
Hello, Maybe developing is not my cup of tea, I get more and more confused with this discussion. Roelof Op 25-9-2020 om 14:37 schreef Richard O'Keefe: It turns out that this problem has appear

[Pharo-users] Re: exercism bowling challenge

2020-09-25 Thread Richard O'Keefe
It turns out that this problem has appeared elsewhere, at least twice to my knowledge, and I had already solved the version at Programming Praxis over a year ago. I actually wrote two solutions, in different programming languages. One of them was 8 lines. That was the longer. The Haskell version

[Pharo-users] Re: exercism bowling challenge

2020-09-25 Thread David Bajger
Hi Richard, I want to reply to some of your insights here, because I think it is sometimes a matter of personal preference on a problem solution, so I want to compete with your opinion here. I might be totally wrong, when I see your way of solution and tell just 'you were right, your solution is mo