I had the same quest. See the thread
http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-to-Smalltalk-interface-td5099844.html#none
Aik-Siong Koh
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
Quite interesting! I was wondering about the correlation to number of
arguments due to the particularities of the keyword syntax which might give
longer method names in the first place.
Best,
Kasper
I am looking at some interprocess communication with Pharo. VW has Opentalk,
VASt has Sst (I think, haven’t looked in a while). Does anything similar exist
for Pharo?
Jerry Kott
This message has been digitally signed.
PGP Fingerprint:
A9181736DD2F1B6CC7CF9E51AC8514F48C0979A5
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 07:10, Jerry Kott wrote:
> Interesting…
>
> I am curious about the purpose of this analysis (other than the
> ‘interesting-ness’ of it). Sure, some names read like sentences, but that
> beats the ’strcpy()’, doesn’t it? I love that in Smalltalk / Pharo, I don’t
> have to re
Interesting…
I am curious about the purpose of this analysis (other than the
‘interesting-ness’ of it). Sure, some names read like sentences, but that beats
the ’strcpy()’, doesn’t it? I love that in Smalltalk / Pharo, I don’t have to
remember cryptic function names and can make the code optima
