Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

I’m puzzled. I have the same rules in two grammars one parse a sequence and the other not. self parse: ‘payable internal' _FunctionTypeNameOptions : | FunctionTypeNameOptions ; FunctionTypeNameOptions : FunctionTypeNameOption 'option' {{}} | FunctionTypeNameOptions FunctionTypeNameOption 'option'

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

I’m puzzled. I have the same rules in two grammars one parse a sequence and the other not. self parse: ‘payable internal' _FunctionTypeNameOptions : | FunctionTypeNameOptions ; FunctionTypeNameOptions : FunctionTypeNameOption 'option' {{}} | FunctionTypeNameOptions FunctionTypeNameOption

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

Le 27/03/2017 à 21:12, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : what was strange is that this version : \s+; %root MultiListObject; %prefix XPML; modifiers_opt : | modifiers ; modifiers : modifier 'modifier' {{}} | modifiers modifier 'modifier' {{}} ; modifier : "public" 'token' {{Modifier}} | "protected" '

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

what was strange is that this version : \s+; %root MultiListObject; %prefix XPML; modifiers_opt : | modifiers ; modifiers : modifier 'modifier' {{}} | modifiers modifier 'modifier' {{}} ; modifier : "public" 'token' {{Modifier}} | "protected" 'token' {{Modifier}} | "private" 'token' {{Modifier}}

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

Hi Stéphane, can you send the complete grammar? The %root directive should have no impact on parse failures. Thierry Le 27/03/2017 à 18:40, Stephane Ducasse a écrit : Apparently there is an interaction with the root directives. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Stephane Ducasse mailto:stepha

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

Apparently there is an interaction with the root directives. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Now I tried to hook modifier logic to test and I cannot have two modifiers. > I thought that > > modifiers > : modifier 'modifier' > | modifiers modifier 'modifier' > ; > allow

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc question

Now I tried to hook modifier logic to test and I cannot have two modifiers. I thought that modifiers : modifier 'modifier' | modifiers modifier 'modifier' ; allows one to have 'public static' but apparently not so I'm totally confused. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: >

[Pharo-users] Smacc question

Hi john I'm learning smacc as a challenge :) I read a review the tutorial that we extracted form your doc. I have the following expression FunctionTypeName = 'function' TypeNameList ( 'internal' | 'external' | 'constant' | 'payable' )* ( 'returns' TypeNameList )? and I started to handle the 'in

Re: [Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

They come with the ConfigurationOfSmaCC which is already in the Moose image. Doru > On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > > Hi > > where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions? > > Stef -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Speaking louder won't make the

[Pharo-users] Smacc debugger

Hi where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions? Stef

[Pharo-users] Smalltalk jobs in Germany

Hi guys Tomcat is looking for Smalltalkers in Germany. Contact them not me :) richard.v-lava...@tomcat.de christian.m...@tomcat.de Stef Actually now we are still looking for more Smalltalker again. Therefore today I turn to You and want to ask, it You know anybody, who has at least 2-3 Y

Re: [Pharo-users] using UFFI in non-crashing way

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Denis Kudriashov > wrote: > >> >> 2017-03-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito : >> >>> Well, you can capture the signal, but the problem is not the signal >>> itself but what caused the problem. The

Re: [Pharo-users] using UFFI in non-crashing way

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > 2017-03-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito : > >> Well, you can capture the signal, but the problem is not the signal >> itself but what caused the problem. The most common case of segfaut is >> memory corruption (and thus a program t

Re: [Pharo-users] Creating Dates before/after Daylight Saving Time change

Hi Sven, i completely agree my monday is not necessarily your monday, but my monday is my monday independently of when i initiate it. my monday (a few days ago) does _not begin at another utc because of a dst change in the meantime. this behaviour could result in additional problems, apart fr

Re: [Pharo-users] using UFFI in non-crashing way

2017-03-27 11:34 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Polito : > Well, you can capture the signal, but the problem is not the signal itself > but what caused the problem. The most common case of segfaut is memory > corruption (and thus a program that tries to wrongly interpret wrong > addresses). If you already co

Re: [Pharo-users] using UFFI in non-crashing way

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Peter Uhnak wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 05:45:04PM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > > > > On 26 Mar 2017, at 15:40, Peter Uhnak wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > is it possible to use UFFI and avoid crashing the image when the > called code segfaults? >

Re: [Pharo-users] Installing Voyage ??

Thanks for the tip but I know that. I have full access to the voyage code. Without knowing the reason and context an issue is useless. Norbert > Am 26.03.2017 um 19:35 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : > > Add an issue in the Voyage github repo and do a pull request to push esteban > releasing a new