Re: [Pharo-users] GitFileTree in Pharo 5

2017-01-30 Thread Pierce Ng
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:12:40PM -0500, sergio ruiz wrote: > I am trying to install GitFileTree from the Catalog Browser. I get a warning > that it’s not tested with Pharo 5. I go ahead anyway, and it just hangs. > > Has anyone else installed it on macOS? Just tried the same on Linux Mint 17 (ba

[Pharo-users] WCAG color contrast rules - was: Re: These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Paul DeBruicker
One way to address this going forward is for theme developers to check their color selections against the e.g. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/) Using a readily available tool: https://leaverou.github.io/contrast-ratio/ And/or one that makes suggestions of co

Re: [Pharo-users] [NeoJSON] creating custom maps

2017-01-30 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 22:32, sergio ruiz wrote: > > This works perfectly! > > one more question.. > > how would i go about changing the default behavior in this case for > NeoJSONWriter’s writeNil instance variable? I don't understand the question. The #writeNil property of NeoJSONWriter co

Re: [Pharo-users] [NeoJSON] creating custom maps

2017-01-30 Thread sergio ruiz
This works perfectly! one more question.. how would i go about changing the default behavior in this case for NeoJSONWriter’s writeNil instance variable?  Thanks! RadioStation class>>#neoJsonMapping: mapper mapper for: self do: [ :mapping | mapping mapInstVars ] peace, sergio pho

Re: [Pharo-users] Exercism programming exercises for Pharo

2017-01-30 Thread Pau Guillot
A 2017-01-30 16:01, horrido escrigué: I created a Smalltalk track at Exercism: https://github.com/exercism/xsmalltalk It would be nice if the Smalltalk community contributed some exercises to help budding Smalltalkers. Thanks. -- View this message i

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
> Ok, I was just bugging you on this one. > > I feel abused, shame on you :D > This is your say not mine. Free software to get success really need to > have strong argument. > > Actually the GUI is a a well documented problem, many blog post and many pages have been written by , maybe I am a mino

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Le 30/01/2017 à 19:46, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit : > Of course it does, glasses greatly improve the problem, they do not make > it go away. [..] Ok, I was just bugging you on this one. > "I don't buy this argument at all: tooltips were modified to become > unreadable, there are responsibility b

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Thanks Ben. Le 30/01/2017 à 19:22, Ben Coman a écrit : > BalloonMorph setBalloonColorTo: Color yellow. I did not know this one. Btw this method name is awful, #ballonColor: would have made it just fine > > Or... > > Pharo3Theme subclass: #Pharo3aTheme I know this one, and I want to avoid it.

Re: [Pharo-users] Phobos and printing

2017-01-30 Thread kmo
I think Phobos is really good. It would be great to have Pharo 6 version. It's a pity about XULRunner being abandoned but all is not lost. There is a fork of Firefox that is committed to keeping XULRunner support - Pale Moon - https://www.palemoon.org/ Ken Pavel Krivanek-3 wrote > Hi Hilaire, >

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:35 PM Hilaire wrote: > Does it make a difference? I guess you are wearing your glass when at > computer. > > Le 30/01/2017 à 17:15, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit : > > I am able to read the Pharo tooltips and I have a 6 degree myopia. > > > > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu >

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Ben Coman
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Hilaire wrote: > I don't buy this argument at all: tooltips were modified to become > unreadable, there are responsibility behind to be taken by someone. > FOSS is not an excuse for mere quality. The point is that people do FOSS to scratch their own itch, not some

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Well it can't. So here is the fix for pharo6 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/edit/19627/ Le 30/01/2017 à 18:53, Hilaire a écrit : > I am not sure the same can be done for the background, it is more > important to improve the contrast (for example yellow or even blue as it > was some release ago)

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Indeed font is different, but this one can be changed programmatically, so can be fixed. I am not sure the same can be done for the background, it is more important to improve the contrast (for example yellow or even blue as it was some release ago). The Squeak tooltip is nice. Hilaire Le 30/01/

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Ben Coman
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Ben Coman wrote: >> Le 30/01/2017 à 15:56, Ben Coman a écrit : >>> Hi Hilaire, >>> >>> Can you provide a screenshot comparison of these? > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Hilaire wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Here are Squeak and Pharo5 tooltips view. >> >> In regard

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Ben Coman
> Le 30/01/2017 à 15:56, Ben Coman a écrit : >> Hi Hilaire, >> >> Can you provide a screenshot comparison of these? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Hilaire wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Here are Squeak and Pharo5 tooltips view. > > In regard First impression count, it is a big loose for Pharo5. Well > t

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Does it make a difference? I guess you are wearing your glass when at computer. Le 30/01/2017 à 17:15, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit : > I am able to read the Pharo tooltips and I have a 6 degree myopia. > -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
I don't buy this argument at all: tooltips were modified to become unreadable, there are responsibility behind to be taken by someone. FOSS is not an excuse for mere quality. In the past I have to fix the WaterTheme because a merge was poorly done at some point without obviously no visual testing

Re: [Pharo-users] Exercism programming exercises for Pharo

2017-01-30 Thread Ben Coman
Nice idea, but after poking around the site for a while, it looks like there is more to do than just seed solutions for some exercises. Some recipe for how students submit exercises would need to be written up. cheers -ben On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:01 PM, horrido wrote: > I created a Smalltalk

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
"So in Pharo5 we have these 'beautiful' unreadable tooltips: tiny black font on light gray (ie. take a look to its squeak counter part, it looks so much more pro)" I am able to read the Pharo tooltips and I have a 6 degree myopia. Sure they can be improved a lot I would not call them pretty but a

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Serge Stinckwich
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Hilaire wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Here are Squeak and Pharo5 tooltips view. > > In regard First impression count, it is a big loose for Pharo5. Well > this whole theme is horrible anyway, contrast is too low in too many part. > > In the past I remember to have fix it (n

Re: [Pharo-users] Exercism programming exercises for Pharo

2017-01-30 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
For one sec I thought you wanted to perform an exorcism with Pharo, I know Pharo is pure technomagic but never assumed it is that powerful :D On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 17:04, horrido wrote: > I created a Smalltalk track at Exercism: > https://github.com/exercism/xsmalltalk >

Re: [Pharo-users] Phobos and printing

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Thanks for the udpate. GTK binding? Thanks but no thanks, it does not fit for pro desktop application. Hilaire Le 30/01/2017 à 16:34, Pavel Krivanek a écrit : > The XULRunner was stopped to be supported in 2015. It can still run now > but without security patches, support of the new OS versions

Re: [Pharo-users] Phobos and printing

2017-01-30 Thread Pavel Krivanek
The XULRunner was stopped to be supported in 2015. It can still run now but without security patches, support of the new OS versions etc. Mozilla is constantly decreasing capabilities of Firefox hacking. It is pity because there is no comparable alternative. Esteban is slowly working on GTK bindin

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Hi Ben, Here are Squeak and Pharo5 tooltips view. In regard First impression count, it is a big loose for Pharo5. Well this whole theme is horrible anyway, contrast is too low in too many part. In the past I remember to have fix it (not sure) but really I'm fed up of such negligence. I think som

[Pharo-users] Exercism programming exercises for Pharo

2017-01-30 Thread horrido
I created a Smalltalk track at Exercism: https://github.com/exercism/xsmalltalk It would be nice if the Smalltalk community contributed some exercises to help budding Smalltalkers. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Exerc

Re: [Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Ben Coman
Hi Hilaire, Can you provide a screenshot comparison of these? cheers -ben On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Hilaire wrote: > Hi, > > So in Pharo5 we have these 'beautiful' unreadable tooltips: tiny black > font on light gray (ie. take a look to its squeak counter part, it looks > so much more p

[Pharo-users] These beautiful tooltips

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Hi, So in Pharo5 we have these 'beautiful' unreadable tooltips: tiny black font on light gray (ie. take a look to its squeak counter part, it looks so much more pro) Is there a way to programmatically change the backround color? Thanks Hilaire -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

Re: [Pharo-users] Phobos and printing

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Hi Pavel, I am in prospective mode exploring alternative for desktop application vs SAAS application (in the later, the cost to maintain may be too high for only one technical guy, me). As I saw in the Phobos demo the Print feature, I just did a quick hack to test print over a html document. So

Re: [Pharo-users] Reliable way to persist graph of object

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Thanks for the update, we will check. Hilaire Le 30/01/2017 à 14:28, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit : > STON can do that. > > It handles shared, circular references, and thus graphs. > > It short circuits classes by using their global name. > > But it is meant for domain level objects, not syst

Re: [Pharo-users] Reliable way to persist graph of object

2017-01-30 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 30 Jan 2017, at 14:22, Hilaire wrote: > > Hi, > > I already reported here the main problem of Fuel, no upward > compatibility among Pharo version. It is a bit pathetic as it nullified > a lot the interest of Fuel. Fuel in itself is really great, so it makes > this situation even sadder. >

[Pharo-users] Reliable way to persist graph of object

2017-01-30 Thread Hilaire
Hi, I already reported here the main problem of Fuel, no upward compatibility among Pharo version. It is a bit pathetic as it nullified a lot the interest of Fuel. Fuel in itself is really great, so it makes this situation even sadder. Phratch is another victim of this problem. Phratch users can'

Re: [Pharo-users] Phobos and printing

2017-01-30 Thread Pavel Krivanek
Hi Hilaire, I will look at it. Are you interested to have Phobos for Pharo 6? The main problem of Phobos is the stopped support of XULRunner by Mozilla without substitute so it's not good idea to use it for long-term projects. Cheers, -- Pavel 2017-01-29 12:34 GMT+01:00 Hilaire : > Hi Pavel, >

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo not opening my image automatically

2017-01-30 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
It does but I do not want to do that, I prefer the traditional way to click on my dock and that Pharo opens my image because I use only one image. I store my libraries using git and github. I do not even save the image unless I really have to store the live state and that rarely happens. On the o