Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
Hi, On custom searches, I know that duckduckgo[1] has a program for developers. Now is focused on popular languages, but maybe we could put our own search button in pharo.org to provide that custom search that harvest the Pharo community intelligence. That could be a project for a small Pharo

Re: [Pharo-users] A little expression interpreter for new forthcoming book

2017-01-13 Thread Stephane Ducasse
Please Damien :) You know, I first dumping and after revisiting. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Damien Pollet wrote: > I just went through it and saw a few possible tweaks (you know me). I'll > commit them directly if I get the time > > On 8 January 2017 at 20:50, Alexandre Bergel > wrote: > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Older Pharo on MacOS Sierra

2017-01-13 Thread Hilaire
Ok, nice to hear that. I will have to change the VM sooner or later for DrGeo then. Le 13/01/2017 à 16:44, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > yes they do. > you just have to download the vm for Pharo4 > > (vry old versions of Pharo maybe will not work, but who knows :P) > > Esteban -- Dr. Geo h

Re: [Pharo-users] Older Pharo on MacOS Sierra

2017-01-13 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
yes they do. you just have to download the vm for Pharo4 (vry old versions of Pharo maybe will not work, but who knows :P) Esteban > On 13 Jan 2017, at 14:58, J.F. Rick wrote: > > While Pharo5 works in Sierra if I place it in the Applications directory, > older Pharo versions don't. While

[Pharo-users] Older Pharo on MacOS Sierra

2017-01-13 Thread J.F. Rick
While Pharo5 works in Sierra if I place it in the Applications directory, older Pharo versions don't. While the image opens, I just get a giant black window. Any way around this? Happy New Year! Jeff

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
> On 13 Jan 2017, at 14:17, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > Yes Sven posts some really nice pharo articles in his medium blog from time > to time > > https://medium.com/concerning-pharo 'Concerning Pharo' is what is called a 'Publication' on Medium.com, it is a grouping of articles by multiple

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Yes Sven posts some really nice pharo articles in his medium blog from time to time https://medium.com/concerning-pharo On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:00 PM Joachim Tuchel wrote: > Oh, and then there are really helpful articles on medium > > > Am 13.01.2017 um 13:54 schrieb werner kassens : > > > >>

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
here you go http://blog.openinworld.com/author/admin/ On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:55 PM werner kassens wrote: > On 01/13/2017 01:01 PM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > For example Ben recently posted a very nice guide for UFFI. > > Hi, > where do i find Bens blog? i think it is not mentioned at > ht

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Joachim Tuchel
Oh, and then there are really helpful articles on medium > Am 13.01.2017 um 13:54 schrieb werner kassens : > >> On 01/13/2017 01:01 PM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: >> For example Ben recently posted a very nice guide for UFFI. > > Hi, > where do i find Bens blog? i think it is not mentioned at >

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread werner kassens
On 01/13/2017 01:01 PM, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: For example Ben recently posted a very nice guide for UFFI. Hi, where do i find Bens blog? i think it is not mentioned at http://pharo.org/web/blogs . btw another very informative blog about pharo, not mentioned there, is Peters https://www.pe

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
I though that my example made this clear, apparently it did not so let me try again. No SEO is not a problem SEO is not a problem because we have made the smart move as a community to host our projects and discussions and documentation to existing google friendly websites like Github, world.st an

Re: [Pharo-users] making scroll smooth

2017-01-13 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Siemen, there is such a place, but it is not as easy as it seems. First, the widget has to accept per-pixel position of the top of the view, which is often something you want to avoid because it is fairly complex. Then you need to ensure that the scrolling can be done per pixel; whereas it is o

Re: [Pharo-users] making scroll smooth

2017-01-13 Thread Henrik Nergaard
Hi Siemen, This is morph/widget specific so it would depend on what widget you want to change (see implementors of #mouseWheel: ). Best regards, Henrik Fra: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] På vegne av Siemen Baader Sendt: 13 January 2017 11:41 Til: Any question about p

Re: [Pharo-users] making scroll smooth

2017-01-13 Thread Guillermo Polito
Check the FastTable package... I only know the entry point, others will give you better guidance though ^^. On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Siemen Baader wrote: > There must be a place that defines that scroll should happen by a line > height, rather than continuously... Does anyone know where

Re: [Pharo-users] making scroll smooth

2017-01-13 Thread Siemen Baader
There must be a place that defines that scroll should happen by a line height, rather than continuously... Does anyone know where to look? -- Siemen

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Siemen Baader
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:14 AM, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de < jtuc...@objektfabrik.de> wrote: > To be honest, I think our answer doesn't really fit to the original post > ;-) > > It's like "once you are in front of the store, you'll know how to find > it!". ;-) > > So the topic of this thread is tha

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
To be honest, I think our answer doesn't really fit to the original post ;-) The OP wanted to express their worries about the fact that it is not easy to find content for Pharo, even though it is there. This is more a critique that says: the content is hard to find if you just know a keyword t

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:12 AM jtuc...@objektfabrik.de < jtuc...@objektfabrik.de> wrote: I remember the days when all my newsgroups were in my Mail client (opera or thunderbird). Stuff was easy and you could search stuff. Everything was in one place., be it chess related, car repair tips or com

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Okay, now that I helped hitchhike this thread into completely different spheres... ;-) I don't think this is only a question of enjoying old tech or vintage fanboyhood. It is also about questonable added value of new technologies. I remember the days when all my newsgroups were in my Mail cli

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
"Is the usenet still around? It had all of what you ask for, without the colors and emojis, though" Everything is still around and kicking, usenets , bbs , Amiga, Amstrad, Atari , dos and a much more All of the actively developed with colors, emojis , acess to internet, 3D graphics, movies, soun

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Am 13.01.17 um 09:38 schrieb Norbert Hartl: So, the chat might be exactly the medium for you because you can edit messages afterwards ; Norbert Or somebody should revoke my internet users' licence ;-) Joachim

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 13.01.2017 um 09:36 schrieb jtuc...@objektfabrik.de: > > ... it's official now: I don't know the difference between discussion groups > and a chat > > So forget my last post, or simply accept that I'm not a chat fan. > Often enough, I hardly understand what I am talking about, so a typ

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
... it's official now: I don't know the difference between discussion groups and a chat So forget my last post, or simply accept that I'm not a chat fan. Often enough, I hardly understand what I am talking about, so a typical chat session is far beyond my horizon ;-) Joachim

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
Am 13.01.17 um 09:25 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano: unless we pay. they basically kidnap our messages and demand a ransom for them (and is expensive)… and the model seems to work, everybody prefers using that than a searchable tool :( no, you give them to them for free and liberally. People don't

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
There are open source alternatives This https://rocket.chat And this https://riot.im/app/#/directory On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 10:26, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > unless we pay. > they basically kidnap our messages and demand a ransom for them (and is > expensive)… and the model seems to work, ev

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Neither is IRC but that has not stopped irc users from creating bots that keep track of a irc channel's message history in logs that are automatically uploaded to websites searchable by google. Unlike Slack , IRC is even worse not even it does not store the last 10k messages , it does not even stor

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
unless we pay. they basically kidnap our messages and demand a ransom for them (and is expensive)… and the model seems to work, everybody prefers using that than a searchable tool :( I would prefer to use an open tool, but well… slack gives us a lot of features and life is like this :( Esteba

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
so it is not a good idea for an open source project, as I feared. > On 13 Jan 2017, at 09:15, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > It eventually disappears , it keep the last 10.000 messages > > No it's not publicly visible quite the contrary , Slack prioritize privacy > because it's meant to be us

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
It eventually disappears , it keep the last 10.000 messages No it's not publicly visible quite the contrary , Slack prioritize privacy because it's meant to be used by teams working on commercial projects which are the ones more likely to pay for a slack subscription. If you want to search as a

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
so it is not publicly available/visible/indexable ? so everything written there basically disappears ? > On 13 Jan 2017, at 09:01, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > Slack encrypts the message history and it only stores 10.000 messages > > You could use the Slack search feature > > https://get.sl

Re: [Pharo-users] Google visibility?

2017-01-13 Thread Dimitris Chloupis
Slack encrypts the message history and it only stores 10.000 messages You could use the Slack search feature https://get.slack.help/hc/en-us/articles/202528808-Search-for-messages-and-files On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 08:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > and slack is closed, right ? > > > > > On 1