Hi,
On 01/01/17 14:37, horrido wrote:
Quite true. The goal of my Smalltalk campaign has always been about
marketing or "branding." The goal has been to get /as many people as
possible/ thinking and talking about Smalltalk. It's not so much about the
quality of conversation as actually having a
Sorry Stef it will never happen.
The issue here is not that Pharo is Smalltalk , the problem here is that
you promote something that is too good to be true.
Coders live in a denial state for decades now . The denial is about not
wanting to recognize that even my hardware is 1 times better in
May this one ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Factbook
Just guessing ;-)
> On 1 Jan 2017, at 22:06, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> Hi Stef!
>
> Which "Collective Intelligence" book are you referring to? Googling it gives
> me plenty of hits that are not really a book
>
> Cheers
> Ale
Hi Stef!
Which "Collective Intelligence" book are you referring to? Googling it gives me
plenty of hits that are not really a book
Cheers
Alexandre
> Le 1 janv. 2017 à 21:32, stepharong a écrit :
>
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 19:04:14 +0100, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
> wrote:
>
> Page view
I tried that tack. I said Pharo is only 8 years old, but some people
come back and tell me that Pharo is still essentially Smalltalk. It's
hard for me to disagree.
Do not fight with such people.
You should not care about assholes.
Pharo is Pharo. Period.
Come to have fun with us building s
On Sun, 01 Jan 2017 19:04:14 +0100, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
wrote:
Page views are a pretty bad metric about quality of conversation. I
remember the XKCD comic about "someone is wrong on the Internet"[1] and
I wonder if the energy should be put there, at all.
[1] https://www.xkcd.c
"Page views are a pretty bad metric about quality of conversation."
Quite true. The goal of my Smalltalk campaign has always been about
marketing or "branding." The goal has been to get /as many people as
possible/ thinking and talking about Smalltalk. It's not so much about the
quality of convers
Sonic Pi is really a nice project.
I participate to the French translation of the documentation.
Connecting Sonic Pi and Pharo would be nice ;-)
Regards
Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 1 janv. 2017 à 19:34, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
> a écrit :
>
> Hi,
> The rasberry pi and alike have a lot of p
Hi,
The rasberry pi and alike have a lot of potential for popularizing
technology and building the future. Recently I found Sonic Pi and after
the conversation between Ben and Hilaire about minecraft and minetest,
I'm learning about the last one and Lua. I would like to bridge Pharo
with that
Page views are a pretty bad metric about quality of conversation. I
remember the XKCD comic about "someone is wrong on the Internet"[1] and
I wonder if the energy should be put there, at all.
[1] https://www.xkcd.com/386/
In my case, some of my fellow programmers friends started with some
fri
May be some kind of "short interview format" is better. Most of the
project pages tell what the project do, and showcase it, but having a
personal author's view on why this project and the technology behind
(Pharo/Smalltalk) is important would be a valuable addition and add the
human story side
I tried that tack. I said Pharo is only 8 years old, but some people come
back and tell me that Pharo is still essentially Smalltalk. It's hard for
me to disagree.
Richard
On 1 January 2017 at 11:27, stepharong wrote:
> Since people believe that new equals better, we market Pharo as new.
> And
Thanks volkert for these kind thoughts.
Dear Pharo Community,
i would like to thank you for all the work and effort to push Pharo
forward.
Pharo is getting better and nicer from day to day. It is hard work and
the hard
work will hopefully never end, because then Pharo is a success ...
I
Since people believe that new equals better, we market Pharo as new.
And Pharo is new and it will continue to improve so this is not even a lie
:)
There is a reason why we decided to go that road and avoid to always say
to people that we use a language
designed nearly 40 years ago.
But you
If stupidity was a power the comment section went nuclear.
I lasted a minute reading the comment section , no idea what kind of radio
active protection suit you are wearing to allow you the time to reply.
But I admire your patience.
On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 at 15:22, horrido wrote:
> Wow! *In just o
Wow! *In just one day*, the Slashdot story added another thousand pageviews
to my TechBeacon article!
However, if you look at the comments, there's an awful lot of disdain for
Smalltalk. It appears that Slashdot is inhabited by a lot of ignorant and
opinionated programmers. I did not realize this.
16 matches
Mail list logo
