Le 13/10/16 à 19:12, Andreas Sunardi a écrit :
Hi Stef,
Well, I'm afraid I'm going to disappoint you.
You are not disppointing me.
I made exactly 1 tool with Pharo in my previous work place and
currently trying to get ready to use Pharo when opportunity comes in
my current work place.
Th
Hi Stef,
Well, I'm afraid I'm going to disappoint you. I made exactly 1 tool with
Pharo in my previous work place and currently trying to get ready to use
Pharo when opportunity comes in my current work place.
That tool I made was a small tool, a custom controller for ASIC testing.
It's a GUI to
I don't think it is a priority. But its nice to get a feel for
possibilities and constraints.
cheers -ben
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Clément Bera
wrote:
> Well for quick methods it's doable.
>
> For inlined control flow operations it's quite difficult. Although it
> could be possible now
Well for quick methods it's doable.
For inlined control flow operations it's quite difficult. Although it could
be possible now with the mustBeBoolean magic thingy...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Vitor Medina Cruz
wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I was thinking the same as you, I think that if I could se
Ben,
I was thinking the same as you, I think that if I could set the image in
development mode, or something like that, it would not do such optimization
so that debugger behaves more like expected. If the debugger could undo
such optimizations would be fine also. I just assumed it should be hard
