Re: [Pharo-users] remove the line at the bottom of the code pane in Nautilus in Pharo 5?

2016-09-04 Thread stepharo
Hi Paul I checked you submission and we cannot simply remove the bar. For example people like me use a lot the format and and we should have a way to activate it. So either we propose a setting or we make sure that the format as you read button is available somewhere. Stef Le 5/9/16 à 00:

Re: [Pharo-users] remove the line at the bottom of the code pane in Nautilus in Pharo 5?

2016-09-04 Thread stepharo
Hi Paul Tx Pay attention that you should use the latest alpha version and publish in the pharo60 inbox. We cannot check all repositories this is too much works and the integration tool only look into one inbox. Stef Le 5/9/16 à 00:26, Paul DeBruicker a écrit : I made issue 19039 and submit

[Pharo-users] Lint Rule for Class-Side Method

2016-09-04 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I'm probably missing something obvious, but it seems like #checksMethod Lint Rules only get checked against instance-side methods. How does one check class-side methods? I converted it to a #checksClass rule, but then hits showed the class definition instead of the offending method source. Thanks.

Re: [Pharo-users] remove the line at the bottom of the code pane in Nautilus in Pharo 5?

2016-09-04 Thread Paul DeBruicker
I made issue 19039 and submitted a slice that does this to the Pharo50Inbox. SLICE-Issue-19039-Remove-the-source-code-annotation-pane-from-Nautilus-PaulDeBruicker.1 stepharo wrote > Do not hesitate to submit a slice. > > Stef > > >> Hi - >> >> I don't think I'll be changing the settings fo

[Pharo-users] Current Preferred Git Tool

2016-09-04 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I've mostly use bare filetree (so not to install anything), and sometimes GitFileTree (eliminates a few steps), but I see there's a lot of activity in other projects. Is anything production-ready? I'm thinking for projects where one needs it to "just work" and doesn't have the luxury of beta testin

Re: [Pharo-users] Comparing floats

2016-09-04 Thread Alexandre Bergel
JUnit has the equivalent of: assert:equals:range: It could then be: self assert: 11.11 equals: 11.11 range: 0.0001 Alexandre > On Sep 2, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: > > how about having assert:closeTo: ? > >> On 02 Sep 2016, at 21:09, Henrik Nergaard wrote: >> >> You could imple

Re: [Pharo-users] UFFI cleanup of externally allocated memory (was Re: UFFI const, unsigned, opaque-ish types)

2016-09-04 Thread Ben Coman
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Pierce Ng wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 12:40:06PM +0800, Ben Coman wrote: >> Referring to the example show_clang_version() below, cleanup is done >> with clang_disposeString(). How does UFFI hook into the object >> finalisation mechanism to call this when the o

[Pharo-users] priority for startup actions

2016-09-04 Thread i.uhnak
Hi, Is there a way to specify a priority for startup scripts? I would like to setup some environment for all the startup scripts (related to cross-platform compatibility), but I don’t really understand in what order are the startup scripts executed. Thanks, Peter