[Pharo-users] Seaside 3.1 and 3.2 in Pharo 5

Issues I've found directly: 1. Seaside still uses #subStrings: instead of substrings: on several places. #subStrings: is deprecated since April 2015. 2. The Seaside control panel icon in menu is not displayed => the icon expression in WAPharoServerAdapterSpecBrowser(class)>>menuCommandOn:

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] 3 new Pharo videos

Hubcap is great!! It should definitely be part of Pharo. Can it show the project description? Cheers, Alexandre > On Mar 18, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > > I provided 3 new videos about my tools/goodies on YouTube: > > Pharo OS-Linux-Ubuntu > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1

Re: [Pharo-users] Seaside 3.1 and 3.2 in Pharo 5

Hi Cyril, > I use Seaside 3.1 in Pharo 5 and I have an application running with this > setup currently. Great! There were indeed very few failing tests that were fixed quickly. I think most of Seaside was just working and you confirm that. > This is the main issues I got the past few weeks: > -

Re: [Pharo-users] Seaside 3.1 and 3.2 in Pharo 5

Le 20/03/2016 19:49, Johan Brichau a écrit : > Hi Pharoers, > > If you are looking to use Seaside in Pharo 5, please go ahead and let us > know if you run into any issues. > Seaside 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 (unreleased) load into Pharo 5 and all tests are > green [1]. > Hi, I use Seaside 3.1 in Pharo 5

Re: [Pharo-users] Seaside 3.1 and 3.2 in Pharo 5

SUPER !! Thanks > On 20 Mar 2016, at 19:49, Johan Brichau wrote: > > Hi Pharoers, > > If you are looking to use Seaside in Pharo 5, please go ahead and let us know > if you run into any issues. > Seaside 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 (unreleased) load into Pharo 5 and all tests are > green [1]. > > Also:

[Pharo-users] Seaside 3.1 and 3.2 in Pharo 5

Hi Pharoers, If you are looking to use Seaside in Pharo 5, please go ahead and let us know if you run into any issues. Seaside 3.1.5 and 3.2.0 (unreleased) load into Pharo 5 and all tests are green [1]. Also: I know the finalization of 3.2.0 is long overdue, so news about that is coming soon.

Re: [Pharo-users] Image Cleaner no longer useful?

Hello Maximiliano On 20-03-16 13:29, Maximiliano Tabacman via Pharo-users wrote: With the latest Image (50651) and VM, the issue remains the same. As Marcus wrote, that is a well-known problem. At the moment, there is one higher priority issue on the image side, and it might well be related.

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pillar] Logo for Pillar

Hi, Personally I do not like it. (Maybe I'm difficult :) ). I think that it would be better to have the "illar" at the bottom and not compressed in the middle. The second column look like an "y" and we read "Pillary". And why is there a wave under pillar? I think that things in a logo have to b

Re: [Pharo-users] Image Cleaner no longer useful?

--- Begin Message --- With the latest Image (50651) and VM, the issue remains the same. The most critical part for me is the fact that cleaning the image (at least using ImageCleaner) does not reduce its size.I have a commercial product with users already using it, who obtain the product by downl

Re: [Pharo-users] Use Shell Command from Pharo

Thanks for the answer, I've already seen this page. And the problem is when I do : OSProcess command: 'touch files.txt', I can't find the created files. But I don't have any error message. For the new lib, I'm working on Pharo 4, and it only works and version 5. -- Guillaume -- View this mess

Re: [Pharo-users] extracting segments in an array

SequenceableCollection mostly, but possibly streams as well On 19 March 2016 at 21:21, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > Hi Damien, > > I didn't understood, which kind of sequences? > > > 2016-03-19 7:40 GMT-03:00 Damien Pollet : > >> Yeah if we redesign the String API it should account for Arrays