Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 5: Bug in removing key combinations

2015-12-30 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, That is why I think the mechanism of categories per morph type is too complicated. Instead, I would prefer to only have instance side keybindings that can be installed during the instantiation. Cheers, Doru > On Dec 30, 2015, at 1:36 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > > 2015-12-29 14:13 GM

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 5: Bug in removing key combinations

2015-12-30 Thread Johan Fabry
Great, that solves the problem I was having. Thanks a lot! > On Dec 29, 2015, at 20:36, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > If you just want to redefine some shortcuts (like in this example), it isn't > necessary to remove the defined (category-shortcuts) but just > add the new ones: > > > | morph | >

Re: [Pharo-users] Determining if a Process is waiting on a Semaphore

2015-12-30 Thread Guillermo Polito
A bit more on that: Processor activeProcess suspendingList. => nil “An active process has nil as a list" Processor activeProcess isSuspended. => true?? p := [ ] forkAt: 30. p suspendingList. => “the list where it is waiting ready to run" p isSuspended. => false? s := Semaphore new. p := ([ s

[Pharo-users] Versionner and package dependencies

2015-12-30 Thread Ferlicot D. Cyril
Hi, I wanted to use versionner to manage some existing configurations but in one of these configuration there is some dependencies on packages that have no project. For example in the baseline there is: spec package: 'Glamour-EyeSee-Presentations' with: [ spec requires: #