Re: [Pharo-users] Nautilus>>openOnClass: gives back a debugger

> On 06 Oct 2015, at 08:31, Nicolai Hess wrote: > > > > 2015-10-06 8:06 GMT+02:00 stepharo >: > Hi federico > > in which version because we cleaned a lot of bad code in nautilus in 5.0 alpha > > > Le 6/10/15 01:10, Federico.Balaguer a écrit : > > Hello, > > I fou

Re: [Pharo-users] Nautilus>>openOnClass: gives back a debugger

2015-10-06 8:06 GMT+02:00 stepharo : > Hi federico > > in which version because we cleaned a lot of bad code in nautilus in 5.0 > alpha > > > Le 6/10/15 01:10, Federico.Balaguer a écrit : > > Hello, >> >> I found a problem when evaluating something like: >> >> Nautilus openOnClass: Object >> >> Th

Re: [Pharo-users] Nautilus>>openOnClass: gives back a debugger

Hi federico in which version because we cleaned a lot of bad code in nautilus in 5.0 alpha Le 6/10/15 01:10, Federico.Balaguer a écrit : Hello, I found a problem when evaluating something like: Nautilus openOnClass: Object The result is a new Nautilus on Object but the package tree list i

[Pharo-users] Nautilus>>openOnClass: gives back a debugger

Hello, I found a problem when evaluating something like: Nautilus openOnClass: Object The result is a new Nautilus on Object but the package tree list is empty and a debugger pops up with a back trace with this: NautilusUI(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #useLastPackagePatternStringForClass: Nautil

Re: [Pharo-users] A keyboard controlled code editor, how difficult would that be?

On 05-10-15 21:11, Peter Uhnák wrote: Is there a reason why this is not in the catalog browser? Do you feel it's not production-ready (missing editing)? Because I am very happy consumer even in this state. :) I'll add a configuration as soon as editing works and the spotter improvements make i

Re: [Pharo-users] Exploring Pier

In Pharo I have Pharo/Smalltalk. Even a simple user can often contribute in simple ways. Even as a simple user of a Pharo tool. I can submit issues, fix simple issues, improve method or class comments, etc. As I learn the Pharo tools and ecosystem I continually improve my ability to take care

[Pharo-users] Any working DBus client for Pharo?

Hi all, I'm looking for a dbus client for Pharo, I saw there is a project on SH (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~DamienCassou/DBus) but the package that should contains pure-smalltalk implementation is empty. Is there something working to send messages via dbus? Regards, Julien

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo family

Have a look at the book EntreprisePharo: a web perspective it will help you get some names :) Le 4/10/15 01:54, a...@234.cz a écrit : Hello, I just did a quick scatch of some projects, frameworks and concepts related to Pharo. I did it because I em confused of the cloud of projects around Pha

Re: [Pharo-users] A keyboard controlled code editor, how difficult would that be?

> MessageBrowser uses Spec, so there are some abstractions in the way. Do you know if RubMethodEditingExample ever worked to commit? I have no idea (and very limited Rubric/Morphic knowledge). But if it worked before it should be reported as bug to the tracker? Is there a reason why this is not i

Re: [Pharo-users] Auto Proxy and Pharo

;-) I know ... i know i will ask for it On 05.10.2015 20:31, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: On 05 Oct 2015, at 19:28, Volkert wrote: Dear all, at work we are using a "auto proxy configuration". Your proxy definition in your app looks like "http://:/proxy.pac. See: https://en.wikiped

Re: [Pharo-users] Auto Proxy and Pharo

> On 05 Oct 2015, at 19:28, Volkert wrote: > > Dear all, > > at work we are using a "auto proxy configuration". Your proxy definition in > your app looks like "http://:/proxy.pac. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_auto-config. > > Any idea, how to use this proxy definition with Pha

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo family

Both would be good. I have find catalog You mentioned, but it lacks grouping and also it has too many projects. It would be good to have structured catalog of almost all projects. But I think that map of main projects will be also very useful especially to newcommers. Adam. Dne Po 5. října 201

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo family

well, we have http://catalog.pharo.org who was there as a temporal solution who does not seems to be going away this year… so it can be enhanced to provide grouping/better links/etc. easily, I think. Esteban > On 05 Oct 2015, at 19:38, Volkert wrote: > > I would be happy if Pharo as somethin

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo family

I would be happy if Pharo as something like this https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Projects or this https://github.com/h4cc/awesome-elixir. That is not exactly what you have in mind, but I think this can be combined with your meta information. BW, Volkert On 05.10.2015 00:10, Adam wrote:

[Pharo-users] Auto Proxy and Pharo

Dear all, at work we are using a "auto proxy configuration". Your proxy definition in your app looks like "http://:/proxy.pac. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_auto-config. Any idea, how to use this proxy definition with Pharo? Would be terrible, if i can not use Pharo here at work.

Re: [Pharo-users] Exploring Pier

Hello Offray, My apologies for the delay in reply. I have been on holiday. Thanks for the suggestions. I am pretty much wanting to stick with Pharo solutions. I want to use and contribute to the Pharo ecosystem. I believe the more we use our own tools and contribute toward the ecosystem the

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo family

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Adam wrote: > I move the map into github in textual file for completing it before drawing > it: https://github.com/AdamSadovsky/pharo-family > - Zinc is now inside > - More circles can be added. I generalized it under "position", so You can > change it into somethin

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

> On 04 Oct 2015, at 23:53, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations... > > ...but first of all: > do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is really > poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, but also nobody i

Re: [Pharo-users] Better Code Completion

> On 05 Oct 2015, at 08:39, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > > On 04/10/15 23:53, Peter Uhnák wrote: >> This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations... >> >> ...but first of all: >> do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is >> really poor and not only that no