On PharoDays, there was a demo of GTChatter (
https://youtu.be/Nmcou_5um2s?t=22m18s ), but it was just prototype, I don't
think it's currently being developed. But maybe it could serve as a bases
for code sharing between images/users.
If anything you could simply push your code to http://ws.stfx.e
Hi,
When using JNIPort I am getting a "java.lang.OutOfMemory: Java heap space".
To go around this, I would need to provide more memory to the JVM.
Essentially, I would like to provide the correspondent of a command line
like:
java -Xmx4000m
How should I do this?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba
Hi Sven,
thank you! I will check it out.
I'll have such situation more and more often.
I'll let you know when I might have extended the code by some addons
Sebastian
On 2015-08-06 3:26 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 07 Aug 2015, at 00:13, Sebastian Heidbrink wrote:
Is there a in-image m
Hi Mariano,
that is what I do, too.
I mean a case where I sit next to somebody and he uses his own computer
and we dabble around.
After a while one sometimes want to just provide the other with some
snippets or classes just implemented.
Email and USB stick are not always an option...
Sebasti
> On 07 Aug 2015, at 00:13, Sebastian Heidbrink wrote:
>
> Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a repository
> server?
Yes, it is called ZnMonticelloServerDelegate - it is meant as an example, but
it works.
Something I do since years is to have my own cross-image-shared package
cache or explicit directory-based monticello repository (added to your
projects) where I have everything. Then, you can simply commit to your
local directory based monticello report and load it in the other
image..quite simple.
Hi again,
I find my self more and more often showing others Pharo and very often
it might be great to just push code changes from one image directly to
another.
Is there a in-image monticello server available that would mimic a
repository server?
I already thought about webannouncements as
Hi,
my seaside, zinc and pharo applications had held user information within
the image or a db.
That was enough since the users never needed access to local resources.
Now I am in the need to allow uploaded and storage of data on the
server"s harddrive or a NAS.
I wonder how you guys solve
stepharo wrote
> You can try squeaksource3 hosted by gemtalksystem.
i.e. http://ss3.gemstone.com/
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Smalltalkhub-permission-denied-tp4838630p4841373.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.c
>From what I remember the logout issue is caused by proxies caches and the
fact that smalltalk hub does not set any headers that prevent/invalidate
caching.
We are having this problem all the time on our university network. To make
it worse sometimes after I log out I get the home page of the prev
We have instability with smalltalkhub and one of these days we should do
a pass but
we are really busy pushing Pharo 50.
You can try squeaksource3 hosted by gemtalksystem.
Stef
Le 6/8/15 20:03, Avdi Grimm a écrit :
Is there a better place to host projects? I was following along in the
updated
Is there a better place to host projects? I was following along in the
updated PBE and ran into this immediately on trying to create my first
project. (I'm also unable to log out of SmalltalkHub).
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:55 AM stepharo wrote:
> Yes from time to time we have this problem...
>
>
I'm seeing the same thing when I try to create a new project.
Potentially related: "Logout" appears to have no effect, and leaves me
(apparently) still logged-in.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:39 AM Damien Cassou
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to update the description of the Pillar project at
> http:
Sabine,
> Am 06.08.2015 um 14:49 schrieb Sabine Manaa :
>
> Norbert,
>
> I have to come back to your answer.
>
> With the .explain option, I can see, how performance is with and without
> index on the _mongo console_.
> As an example, I see: with index only 2 objects scanned, without: 200.
Hi Sabine,
Not related to these indexes per se but I had performance problems
associated with the fact that MongoTalk asked for all collections again and
again.
I cached them (in my own MongoTalk version) and added debugging to the
MongoOperations so that I could see what was going on.
This alon
Norbert,
I have to come back to your answer.
With the .explain option, I can see, how performance is with and without
index on the _mongo console_.
As an example, I see: with index only 2 objects scanned, without: 200.
Performance is perfect with index.
But _from smalltalk_, it seems to iterate
16 matches
Mail list logo