Re: [Pharo-users] question on syntax "negate numbers"

> On 10 Nov 2014, at 8:45 , Thierry Goubier wrote: > > > > 2014-11-10 7:59 GMT+01:00 Henrik Johansen >: > > IMHO, the old compiler is right, whitespace should not be allowed in literals. > > Whitespace can be \t or \n,\r which makes for strange literals

Re: [Pharo-users] question on syntax "negate numbers"

2014-11-10 7:59 GMT+01:00 Henrik Johansen : > > IMHO, the old compiler is right, whitespace should not be allowed in > literals. > Whitespace can be \t or \n,\r which makes for strange literals (multilines) such as: - 5 And would create ambiguity in some cases is 4 - 5 two literals, or is it

Re: [Pharo-users] question on syntax "negate numbers"

> On 08 Nov 2014, at 5:55 , Werner Kassens wrote: > > but if you omit the space between - and 3 the old compiler understands it > too, hence its just a convenience thing that cant lead to misunderstandings, > or? > btw opal also understands this: > -3@2. --> (-3@2) > i mean, its obviou

[Pharo-users] [Survey] Reasoning about objects

Hi all, In order to improve object inspectors we are doing a survey. We want to know whether several features are important to you or not when trying to understand objects. This is a very short survey and should't take you more than 10 minutes to complete. Please take this time to participate. H

Re: [Pharo-users] Polygons in woden

Hi Nicola, Sorry for not answering before. I have to improve my mail filters. As for the shadows, currently only the spotlights can cast shadows. I have yet to implement shadow mapping for directional lights. As for point light, I won't be implementing them in the near future, because they are ve