Hi!
On 08/25/2014 05:34 PM, volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
Dear all,
i have problems with Pharo 3.0 under Win 8.1 (64 Bit). When i quit Pharo
and then restarting
the it, Pharo-VM and Windows hangs. After some time (2-3 Minutes), the
Pharo VM File Dialog opens. From time to time the Windows Desktop (!
Alain Rastoul wrote:
Hi,
No problem for me with Windows 8.1 (64 bits) and Pharo 3, I use it
every day.
If your computer crashes, I would suspect some hardware related issue,
not a vm problem.
Did you check in the system event log ?
(right click on computer icon in the file explorer, choose
volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
Dear all,
i have problems with Pharo 3.0 under Win 8.1 (64 Bit). When i quit
Pharo and then restarting
the it, Pharo-VM and Windows hangs. After some time (2-3 Minutes), the
Pharo VM File Dialog opens. From time to time the Windows Desktop (!)
crashes and restarts.
Trygve,
Thanks to you for sharing DCI. I can't grasp it yet, but the relation
with the Dynabook and its intended audience of grown up curious and
playful adults are intriguing to me and a place where I can see common
interest.
Cheers,
Offray
On 08/26/2014 10:32 AM, Trygve Reenskaug wrote:
Hi,
No problem for me with Windows 8.1 (64 bits) and Pharo 3, I use it every
day.
If your computer crashes, I would suspect some hardware related issue,
not a vm problem.
Did you check in the system event log ?
(right click on computer icon in the file explorer, choose manage then
go in sys
I would guess the image/vm is doing something IO related. What were you
experimenting with ? What did you load ? Does it also happen in a clean image ?
On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:24, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> Can you have a look at the PharoDebug.log file?
>
> Maybe we can find the cause there.
>
Can you have a look at the PharoDebug.log file?
Maybe we can find the cause there.
Regards,
Phil
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, volk...@nivoba.de
wrote:
> @Esteban, Phil & Sven: The bad thing is, that it does not happen all the
> time, so a better description of is not possible. I will try
@Esteban, Phil & Sven: The bad thing is, that it does not happen all the
time, so a better description of is not possible. I will try to figure
out under which conditions this behavior occurs and hope to give you a
better description.
If someone found a strange behavior similar to mine, he/she
Hi,
Many thanks for your ref [1]. I have skimmed it and find it both well
written and interesting. I must read it more carefully as necessary
background when I am embarking on the 'new Dynabook' (BOOK) project. My
target audience is professionals using computers as an essential part of
their w
Hi Wilfred,
Smalltalk builds on Simula, Lisp, ++
So yes, there is a strong similarity with Lisp but I hope we can make
the programs more readable.
Do you mean to use the command shell for running remote objects
('apps')? Well worth trying.
A next step could be to run them from DCI role metho
Windows 8.1 here and zero problems.
Now, I am using zeroconf, but that shouldn't be an issue.
Phil
Yes, yes, yes.
BTW: Readable code is the goal of DCI.
On 26.08.2014 14:26, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
Open source means nothing if you cannot read the code, do not understand
it, cannot change it - easily.
Yes!!! This is why just open sourcing a bad idea like an OS (
Personally I think the direction Moose is going is the right one, with
visualising code for understanding its overall structure. I do think
however that a system can help a user understand is an AI system, not in
the strict sense of the word but a system that can understand user needs
and act accor
My children have a Windows 8.1 (64-bit) machine, last time I checked Pharo ran
fine (actually this video was done in VirtualBox) :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKokxrQtrg0
I could check again tonight, but I suspect it will just work.
On 25 Aug 2014, at 17:34, volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
> De
Hi,
I’m sorry, I never tested pharo on windows 8.1.
and the only thing I can promise is that I will create a parallels image next
weeks (a couple of them), with 8.1 to test it…
Esteban
On 25 Aug 2014, at 17:34, volk...@nivoba.de wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> i have problems with Pharo 3.0 under W
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
> Open source means nothing if you cannot read the code, do not understand
> it, cannot change it - easily.
Yes!!! This is why just open sourcing a bad idea like an OS (see GNU/Linux)
doesn't cut it. Even though theoretically you have access to the whole
system, you c
Trygve Reenskaug wrote
> Alan Kay once said something like "an operating system is what the
> language designers omitted to include in their language".
That's a great one! Dan Ingalls put it this way in Design Principles Behind
Smalltalk (http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~evans/cs655/readings/smalltalk
On 26 Aug 2014, at 01:33, Wilfred Hughes wrote:
> Sounds like the Dynabook goal rather overlaps with that of Lisp Machines. The
> idea of a single system that allows you to modify any part at runtime,
> inspect any part, or drop into a debugger anywhere is extremely powerful and
> wonderful t
It's very vague; I'm thinking as I write. My off-the-cuff answer: Start
from Alan's definition of object orientation: "/... Thus its semantics
are a bit like having thousands and thousands of computers all hooked
together by a very fast network./" The BOOK consists of its own objects
as well
Hi Dan,
You made me very happy when you made it to my talk on Thursday. It was
impossible for me to present a new paradigm in less than 30 minutes, but
I hope I triggered your curiosity.
I think your best next step would be to read my article on the DCI
Execution model
http://fulloo.info/Doc
20 matches
Mail list logo
