On 30.05.2014 08:50, Joachim Geidel wrote:
> Yes, this page helped, but as you wrote: basic and simple example -
> the more involved stuff remains undocumented. When working on JNIPort,
> I struggled with simple things like de-referencing a pointer to a
> pointer to a struct etc. - I didn’t find d
Hi,
why when morph tree send updateList there is an announcement from the
model? It was not the case before.
Thanks
Hilaire
--
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
On Jun 3, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>
> On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>>
To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
wrong ?
>>>
>>> If there is type inferenc
On 3 juin 2014, at 17:34, Johan Fabry wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>
>>> To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
>>> wrong ?
>>
>> If there is type inference then it is statically typed (at least partially
>> if not every
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
Yes. I am doing something similar. btw, is it a strong convention that Tex commands and
environments are all lowercase? That is, should I force the annotation label in
"\begin{note}" to lowercase, or should I pass that th
On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> We have to do some type inference (for tools) some time. Should be fun. (by
> the way, is there something like that already?)
There has been some work done on type inference for Smalltalk, the RoelTyper
example that I keep mentioning worked o
On Jun 3, 2014, at 4:21 AM, Camille Teruel wrote:
>> To what I understand, types are inferred, it is not statically typed. Am I
>> wrong ?
>
> If there is type inference then it is statically typed (at least partially if
> not every variable type can be inferred)
To repeat myself: this is n
On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
>> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose an existing name
>> for their new programming language (interesting for a company that is very
>> careful about their own brand names), but that swift seems to be statically
>> typed
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> The links in there do not seem to work. When linking to smalltalkhub the ~is
> exchanged by %7E
I checked and this is not a bug of Pillar but a bug of github's markdown:
https://github.com/github/markup/issues/311
--
Damien Cassou
htt
Hi,
On 03 Jun 2014, at 08:01, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> In Pharo 3.0 we do have Fuel in the image.
>
> Now, there is also Fuel in the ConfigurationBrowser.
>
> When one wants to work with Fuel, should one update the image with what is in
> the ConfigurationBrowser?
no
Esteban
>
> TIA
>
In Pharo 3.0 we do have Fuel in the image.
Now, there is also Fuel in the ConfigurationBrowser.
When one wants to work with Fuel, should one update the image with what is
in the ConfigurationBrowser?
TIA
Phil
I don't think the claim is that Pharo or any Smalltalk is 'simple', but
when someone new to coding has to first learn how to pretend they're using
a late 70"s terminal and a crappy text editor, then remember 2 arcane
commands just to get a project built, never mind debug it, the price of
entry
"What makes Pharo and Smalltalk so cool is this magical simplicity on so
many levels."
I have a problem with this, I think its not sincere. I know that a Pharo
developers would love to throw on my face the basic syntax of Pharo that
can fit in a single page but the truth is that Pharo because it i
On 03 Jun 2014, at 10:53, kilon alios wrote:
> For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground demo
> here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
>
> Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has
On 03 Jun 2014, at 14:23, kilon alios wrote:
> For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground demo
> here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
>
> Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has
For anyone who has not not watched it yet, you can watch the Playground
demo here. Looks like they were inspired by Bred Victor demos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l62x8Oq_QP4
Swift is statically typed with type inference. BUT it has generics and
optional types. So it looks like it tries to le
Hi,
The work on GToolkit goes in this direction. Funny enough, we also
have a Playground :).
Look here for an example:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/dynamic-exploration-of-a-postgres-db-with-the-gtinspector/
More will come in this direction. I happen to believe that this is the
are
On 3 juin 2014, at 09:10, Clément Bera wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objektfabrik.de :
> I remember seeing a demo of F# at an Eclipse conference a few years ago. It
> also very much reminded me of Smalltalk.
>
> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose
The big question here is not whether Pharo can implement something similar
to Playground, Moose and Roassal in particular are quite close.
The one million dollars question is Swift a live coding language or is
Swift a language with some live coding tools. Obviously I would love to be
the first opt
Clement,
Hmm, as far as I've read (and I haven't read much), all methods have an
obligatory return type.
But you can write let a = "some text", so I guess you are right. And me
probably too ;-)
Joachim
Am 03.06.14 09:10, schrieb Clément Bera:
2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objekt
Hi,
The work on GToolkit goes in this direction. Funny enough, we also have a
Playground :).
Look here for an example:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/dynamic-exploration-of-a-postgres-db-with-the-gtinspector/
More will come in this direction. I happen to believe that this is the area
with
Yeah looks cool. Just a step further, no revolution though. The fact
that for each statement Playground will immediately show its results
next to the code, makes programming a bit easier.
I wonder how/if this works for code that does not define all its values
with let statements ;-). But I gue
2014-06-03 8:40 GMT+02:00 jtuc...@objektfabrik.de :
> I remember seeing a demo of F# at an Eclipse conference a few years ago.
> It also very much reminded me of Smalltalk.
>
> What's interesting about swift is not only that Apple chose an existing
> name for their new programming language (intere
Here's an example of the Playground in use:
https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/ios/recipes/xcode_help-source_editor/ExploringandEvaluatingSwiftCodeinaPlayground/ExploringandEvaluatingSwiftCodeinaPlayground.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40009975-CH26
--
View this message in context:
ht
24 matches
Mail list logo
