Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] JNIPort for Pharo 3.0 alpha

Hi everbody, I have published an update of JNIPort 3.0 alpha at SmalltalkHub. Changes from the previous version: - The Java classes needed for calling back from Java into Smalltalk and for executing the regression tests have been updated. I have shortened the Java package name from org.metagno

Re: [Pharo-users] glorp

Hello, I think Glorp is used with DBXTalk for relational databases by multiple people. Usually, with Pharo, people use as a persistance layer either MongoDB with the frameworks MongoTalk/Voyage. Gemstone is also used quite often for large scale application but Gemstone is not free. Regards. 2

[Pharo-users] glorp

Hi all, can someone tell me if glorp is active there ar is using glorp or other persistence framework in production projects? Tia Ing. Pablo Digonzelli Software Solutions IP-Solutiones SRL Metrotec SRL 25 de Mayo 521 Email: pdigonze...@softsargentina.com pdigonze...@gmail.com Cel: 5493

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

Christophe Demarey wrote > ... but sometimes, even in a well-designed class, you may need to test a > very small part of this class, and in this case, you need a real object > with some mocked methods. I assume that there is a method need to be tested, but it calls towards an other either public o

Re: [Pharo-users] We need *you* for the upcoming Pharo's website

Well I tried, several times , but I am not happy with the end result. In any case I am finished with this and since I promised to upload it here it is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol5ivaEATLQ Sorry I cannot deliver something of bet

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

TDD is great if you don't know the domain you're modeling, or if it isn't completely specified. Because you end up having the required functionality completely tested. On the other hand, if you are an expert in the domain, you'll implement features that are beyond the required (initial) specs, so

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

TDD does not convince me much either, I see it as a convenience but I am not so sure it really worths its time. Maybe because there too few coders out there that would make changes that will massively affect the system, or they wont do some form of testing anyway. I can see the benefit of TDD when

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

TDD is not about testing, it's about development. -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2014-04-23 19:35 GMT+04:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe : > More or less what I think: testing is necessary and should be pragmatic & > fun, not a dogma > > http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

Testing has become more necessary in the context of Continuous Integration and automated building. You can't have those without test coverage. On the other hand, TDD is rather difficult with tools that doesn't allow you to develop inside the debugger, which is basically everything out there that i

Re: [Pharo-users] Modal widget

Hello Esteban, I am not sure it matches the situation. Did you see my screen shot with the modal morph embedded in a parent morph? All but the modal morph should be locked but perfectly visible. Hilaire Le 23/04/2014 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > look at the implementation of #callInWorld

[Pharo-users] [OT] TDD is dead. Long live testing. (DHH)

More or less what I think: testing is necessary and should be pragmatic & fun, not a dogma http://david.heinemeierhansson.com/2014/tdd-is-dead-long-live-testing.html

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

Le 23 avr. 2014 à 15:37, Attila Magyar a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > I'm not sure I fully understand, are you referring to partial mocking? Where > you have a real object but with some mocked methods? If this is the case, > then no, this is not supported. Some people consider this as a test sme

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

Hi Christophe, I'm not sure I fully understand, are you referring to partial mocking? Where you have a real object but with some mocked methods? If this is the case, then no, this is not supported. Some people consider this as a test smell, and I agree with them. Maybe the object under test is too

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

Hi, Le 17 avr. 2014 à 19:22, Attila Magyar a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > Sorry for my late response. You can use the following syntax to signal an > error in response to an incoming message: > > protocol describe >once: mock recv: #msg; >signals: Error. I did not notice this one. Than

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

On 23 Apr 2014, at 2:31 , Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > > On 23 April 2014 13:17, Henrik Johansen wrote: > > On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because > > of bad approximation, when drawing more that 90 degree arcs. > >

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

On 23 April 2014 13:17, Henrik Johansen wrote: > > On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko wrote: > > > as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because > > of bad approximation, when drawing more that 90 degree arcs. > > > > also, in athens, arc segment is defined with following inp

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Gravatar for Pharo Smalltalk

There is already code for that in the image: (PharoUser new retrieveGravatarFromMail: 's...@stfx.eu') openInWindow. PharoUser is an odd class (this code should be on the class side). Maybe both approaches can be combined ? On 23 Apr 2014, at 13:44, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Hi, > > The "Grav

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner screencast

Christophe Demarey wrote: Hello, I made a small screencast on Versionner to explain how to use it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5Dbmmln8tA Regards, Christophe. Very nice. Seeing how to use it definitely helps me consider using it. cheers -ben

Re: [Pharo-users] Error when trying to initiate Pharo in Ubuntu 64 bits

Am 23.04.2014 um 11:36 schrieb Stephan Eggermont : >> Whoever compiled it deserves commendation. Nevertheless, in my opinion it´s >> an issue to keep in mind for the future; distributions are likely to upgrade >> their libc at >different points in time, and a good lowest common >> denominator

Re: [Pharo-users] Athens and ellipse drawing

On 22 Apr 2014, at 2:23 , Igor Stasenko wrote: > as for why there's 4 arc segments instead of one, its because > of bad approximation, when drawing more that 90 degree arcs. > > also, in athens, arc segment is defined with following inputs: > - end point of previous segment (implicit) > - angl

Re: [Pharo-users] Error when trying to initiate Pharo in Ubuntu 64 bits

>Whoever compiled it deserves commendation. Nevertheless, in my opinion it´s an >issue to keep in mind for the future; distributions are likely to upgrade >their libc at >different points in time, and a good lowest common denominator >should be chosen with care, otherwise it´s not really "common

Re: [Pharo-users] Versionner screencast

Hi Christophe Nice presentation. Showing how Versionner is supposed to be used is very helpful. Stephan

Re: [Pharo-users] Modal widget

which now I remember I always complemented it “web-like”: I added a transparent sticky morph behind, so all the morphs become unaccessible… I do not remember why I needed it, thought. Esteban On 23 Apr 2014, at 10:51, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > look at the implementation of #callInWorld f

Re: [Pharo-users] Modal widget

look at the implementation of #callInWorld for Magritte-Morph. I always liked that solution :) Esteban On 23 Apr 2014, at 10:46, Hilaire Fernandes wrote: > Hello, > > In a morph hierarchy I would like one morph child to be modal (i.e. all > other morphs are locked and the system is waiting f