On 28 July 2013 03:46, Pierce Ng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to share that I wrote a blog post on using Unix domain sockets in
> Pharo.
>
> http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.07.27.unixdomainsockets.html
>
> The NetNameResolver bits can be made more Smalltalk-ish. Also, I'll be
> looking into the
Hello,
I want to share that I wrote a blog post on using Unix domain sockets in
Pharo.
http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.07.27.unixdomainsockets.html
The NetNameResolver bits can be made more Smalltalk-ish. Also, I'll be
looking into the minor changes needed to support SocketStream as well.
M
Jannik can you
- write a test
- add a bug entry
This would be to align this point. And also verify it in VW, Squeak and other.
Stef
On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:43 PM, jannik.laval wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Something I did not know and I would like to share:
> what is the result of "#a
Udo,
On 27 Jul 2013, at 12:50, Udo Schneider wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On 27.07.13 00:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>> Be sure to tell the websocketpp guys about this issue ;-)
> Already did.
Good.
> The fact that websocketpp based apps return with 500 is even "funnier" IMHO…
:-)
>> A quick
What exactly is https://github.com/pharo-project about ?
It is to test the Monticello Git integration? Give visibility to Pharo?
I also see Pharo-VM. Is this the reference repository for the VM? (which
used to on Gitorious for the OSX code I know about).
Thanks.
Phil
Hi Sven,
On 27.07.13 00:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Be sure to tell the websocketpp guys about this issue ;-)
Already did. The fact that websocketpp based apps return with 500 is
even "funnier" IMHO...
A quick hack from our side would be to bypass the normal protocol of ZnHeader
(spec
