[PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2006-12-31 Thread Rolf Østvik
0.050..0.050 rows=68 loops=1) Index Cond: (start_date_time > '2006-12-11 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) Total runtime: 1010.775 ms Thanks for tips. Best regards Rolf Østvik ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2006-12-31 Thread Rolf Østvik
--- Claus Guttesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > > I have a simple query which uses 32ms on 7.4.14 > and 1015ms on 8.2.0. > > I guess 7.4.14 creates a better execution plan > than 8.2.0 for this query but > > i don't know how to get it to select a better one. > > Explain analyse output will be fou

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-01 Thread Rolf Østvik
(I am sorry if my explain analyze outputs gets garbled) --- Dennis Bjorklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > Rolf Østvik skrev: > > > I have a simple query which uses 32ms on 7.4.14 > and 1015ms on 8.2.0. > > I guess 7.4.14 creates a better execution plan >

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-01 Thread Rolf Østvik
--- Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > > On 31-Dec-06, at 6:33 AM, Rolf Østvik wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > I have a simple query which uses 32ms on 7.4.14 > and 1015ms on 8.2.0. > > I guess 7.4.14 creates a better execution plan > than

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-01 Thread Rolf Østvik
scan? Are you sure you haven't > tweaked any parameters > you didn't tell us about, such as setting > enable_seqscan = off? I haven't touched enable_seqscan. It could be that i have forgotton to tell you about a parameter i have tweaked, but i doubt it. Best regards Rolf Øst

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-02 Thread Rolf Østvik
ive uut_result value instead of > 42). If it doesn't > want to use an indexscan for this, disable plan > types until it does. > This would perhaps shed some light on why 8.2 > doesn't want to use a scan > like that as the inside of a nestloop. > >

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-03 Thread Rolf Østvik
=0.069..0.069 rows=0 loops=1) Index Cond: (uut_result = $1) Filter: (step_parent = 0) Total runtime: 0.112 ms (4 rows) Best regards, Rolf Østvik __ Bruker du Yahoo!? Lei av spam? Yahoo! Mail har den beste spambeskyttelsen http

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-05 Thread Rolf Østvik
ate_time > '2006-12-11'"). I will continue to adjust other parameters and see what i can manage myself. Best regards Rolf Østvik __ Bruker du Yahoo!? Lei av spam? Yahoo! Mail har den beste spambeskyttelsen http://no.mail.yahoo.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PERFORM] Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

2007-01-09 Thread Rolf Østvik
eas from this thread , read some more documentation, read the archives, and tested other queries and will try to speed up some more advance queries. Thanks everyone. best regards Rolf Østvik __ Bruker du Yahoo!? Lei av spam