On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Matt Daw wrote:
> Ugh, never mind. I ran ltrace and it's spending 99% of its time in
> gettimeofday.
yeah -- this is a fairly common report. some systems (windows) have a
less accurate but much faster gettimeofday().
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance maili
Jeff Janes wrote
>
> It seems like it shouldn't be all that hard to write a tool to parse
> WAL logs in a context-free basis (i.e. without the backup to start
> applying them to) and emit some kind of descriptions of the records
> and their sizes. But I don't know about such a tool already exist
