Peter Hussey writes:
> Using the default of 1MB work_mem, the planner chooses a hash join plan :
> "Hash Left Join (cost=252641.82..11847353.87 rows=971572 width=111) (actual
> time=124196.670..280461.604 rows=968080 loops=1)"
> ...
> For the same default 1MB work_mem, a nested loop plan is bette
Greg Smith wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
Note that not all of the Sandforce drives include a capacitor; I hope
you got one that does! I wasn't aware any of the SF drives with a
capacitor on them were even shipping yet, all of the ones I'd seen
were the chipset that doesn't include one still. Have
I'm wondering whether columns, in the select list of a view that is used
in a join, which are not used either as join criteria or in the select
list of the overall query, effect the performance of the query.
In other words supposed I define a view something like
CREATE view MyView AS SELECT a,
Eric Schwarzenbach writes:
> I'm wondering whether columns, in the select list of a view that is used
> in a join, which are not used either as join criteria or in the select
> list of the overall query, effect the performance of the query.
If the view gets "flattened" into the calling query th
6700tps?! Wow..
Ok, I'm impressed. May wait a bit for prices to come somewhat, but that
sounds like two of those are going in one of my production machines
(Raid 1, of course)
Yeb Havinga wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> Greg Smith wrote:
>>> Note that not all of the Sandforce drives include a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Vlad Arkhipov wrote:
> There is a partitioned table with 2 partitions:
>
> drop table if exists p cascade;
>
> create table p (
> id bigint not null primary key,
> ts timestamp);
>
> create table p_actual ( check (ts is null) ) inherits (p);
> create table p_hist