On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:10 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> All this talk of WAL writing lately has me wondering something I haven't
> spent enough time looking at the source to figure out myself this
> week...any good rules of thumb out there for estimating WAL volume? I'm
> used to just measuring
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 12:19:51PM +0200, Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> From the DELL site it seems this `PERC 5/i' on board controller
> >> (assuming that's what you have) doesn't even have a BBU. If you don't
> >> plan to post here in a few weeks again about data corruption, g
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:12:34PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tested speed difference between TRUNCATE TABLE and DROP TABLE
> (tested on my notebook ext3 and Linux fedora 7):
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test01() RETURNS SETOF double precision
> AS $$
> DECLARE t1 timestamp wit
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:12:34PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> I tested speed difference between TRUNCATE TABLE and DROP TABLE
>> (tested on my notebook ext3 and Linux fedora 7):
> Are you sure you can ignore the added cost of an EXECUTE? I tried th
